Predictive values of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation for fluid responsiveness in patients with pneumoperitoneum

被引:0
作者
Marko Zlicar
Vesna Novak-Jankovic
Rok Blagus
Maurizio Cecconi
机构
[1] University Medical Centre Ljubljana,Clinical Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy
[2] University of Ljubljana,Institute for Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Medical Faculty
[3] Adult Critical Care,undefined
[4] St. George’s Healthcare NHS Trust,undefined
来源
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | 2018年 / 32卷
关键词
Fluid responsiveness; Haemodynamics; Pneumoperitoneum; Dynamic predictors;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Animal studies suggest that dynamic predictors remain useful in patients with pneumoperitoneum, but human data is conflicting. Our aim was to determine predictive values of pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV) in patients with pneumoperitoneum using LiDCORapid™ haemodynamic monitor. Standardised fluid challenges of colloid were administered to patients undergoing laparoscopic procedures, one fluid challenge per patient. Intra-abdominal pressure was automatically held at 12 mmHg. Fluid responsiveness was defined as an increase in nominal stroke index (nSI) ≥ 10%. Linear regression was used to assess the ability of PPV and SVV to track the changes of nSI and logistic regression and area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) to assess the predictive value of PPV and SVV for fluid responsiveness. Threshold values for PPV and SVV were obtained using the “gray zone” approach. A p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. 56 patients were included in analysis. 41 patients (73%) responded to fluids. Both PPV and SVV tracked changes in nSI (Spearman correlation coefficients 0.34 for PPV and 0.53 for SVV). Odds ratio for fluid responsiveness for PPV was 1.163 (95% CI 1.01–1.34) and for SVV 1.341 (95% CI 1.10–1.63). PPV achieved an AUROC of 0.674 (95% CI 0.518–0.830) and SVV 0.80 (95% CI 0.668–0.932). The gray zone of PPV ranged between 6.5 and 20.5% and that of SVV between 7.5 and 13%. During pneumoperitoneum, as measured by LiDCORapid™, PPV and SVV can predict fluid responsiveness, however their sensitivity is lower than the one reported in conditions without pneumoperitoneum. Trial registry number: (with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry): ACTRN12612000456853.
引用
收藏
页码:825 / 832
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Respiratory variation of plethysmography signal with a pulse oxymeter: new predictive parameters of fluid responsiveness? [J].
M Feissel ;
J Badie ;
K Bendjelid ;
I Mangin ;
G Robles ;
O Ruyer ;
J Faller ;
J Teboul .
Critical Care, 9 (Suppl 1)
[32]   Comparative study of pressure- and volume-controlled ventilation on stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery [J].
Lee, Ji Yeon ;
Park, Hee Yeon ;
Jung, Wol Seon ;
Jo, Youn Yi ;
Kwak, Hyun Jeong .
JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2012, 27 (05) :531.e9-531.e14
[33]   Influence of tidal volume on pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation during experimental intra-abdominal hypertension [J].
F. Díaz ;
B. Erranz ;
A. Donoso ;
T. Salomon ;
Pablo Cruces .
BMC Anesthesiology, 15
[34]   Pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation during different loading conditions in a paediatric animal model [J].
Renner, J. ;
Cavus, E. ;
Meybohm, P. ;
Gruenewald, M. ;
Steinfath, M. ;
Scholz, J. ;
Boening, A. ;
Bein, B. .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2008, 52 (03) :374-380
[35]   Pulse pressure variation as a tool to detect hypovolaemia during pneumoperitoneum [J].
Bliacheriene, F. ;
Machado, S. B. ;
Fonseca, E. B. ;
Otsuke, D. ;
Auler, J. O. C., Jr. ;
Michard, F. .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2007, 51 (09) :1268-1272
[36]   Automated stroke volume and pulse pressure variations predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with obstructive jaundice [J].
Zhao, Feng ;
Wang, Peng ;
Pei, Shujun ;
Mi, Weidong ;
Fu, Qiang .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2015, 8 (11) :20751-20759
[37]   Right ventricular and pulmonary artery pulse pressure variation and systolic pressure variation for the prediction of fluid responsiveness: an interventional study in coronary artery bypass surgery patients [J].
Moritz Flick ;
Ulrike Sand ;
Alina Bergholz ;
Karim Kouz ;
Beate Reiter ;
Doris Flotzinger ;
Bernd Saugel ;
Jens Christian Kubitz .
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 2022, 36 :1817-1825
[38]   Right ventricular and pulmonary artery pulse pressure variation and systolic pressure variation for the prediction of fluid responsiveness: an interventional study in coronary artery bypass surgery patients [J].
Flick, Moritz ;
Sand, Ulrike ;
Bergholz, Alina ;
Kouz, Karim ;
Reiter, Beate ;
Flotzinger, Doris ;
Saugel, Bernd ;
Kubitz, Jens Christian .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2022, 36 (06) :1817-1825
[39]   Pulse pressure variation and volume responsiveness during acutely increased pulmonary artery pressure: an experimental study [J].
Fritz Daudel ;
David Tüller ;
Stefanie Krähenbühl ;
Stephan M Jakob ;
Jukka Takala .
Critical Care, 14
[40]   Pulse Pressure Variation Predicts Fluid Responsiveness in Elderly Patients After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery [J].
Yazigi, Alexandre ;
Khoury, Eliane ;
Hlais, Sani ;
Madi-Jebara, Samia ;
Haddad, Fadia ;
Hayek, Gemma ;
Jabbour, Khalil .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2012, 26 (03) :387-390