Predictive values of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation for fluid responsiveness in patients with pneumoperitoneum

被引:0
|
作者
Marko Zlicar
Vesna Novak-Jankovic
Rok Blagus
Maurizio Cecconi
机构
[1] University Medical Centre Ljubljana,Clinical Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy
[2] University of Ljubljana,Institute for Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Medical Faculty
[3] Adult Critical Care,undefined
[4] St. George’s Healthcare NHS Trust,undefined
来源
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | 2018年 / 32卷
关键词
Fluid responsiveness; Haemodynamics; Pneumoperitoneum; Dynamic predictors;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Animal studies suggest that dynamic predictors remain useful in patients with pneumoperitoneum, but human data is conflicting. Our aim was to determine predictive values of pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV) in patients with pneumoperitoneum using LiDCORapid™ haemodynamic monitor. Standardised fluid challenges of colloid were administered to patients undergoing laparoscopic procedures, one fluid challenge per patient. Intra-abdominal pressure was automatically held at 12 mmHg. Fluid responsiveness was defined as an increase in nominal stroke index (nSI) ≥ 10%. Linear regression was used to assess the ability of PPV and SVV to track the changes of nSI and logistic regression and area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) to assess the predictive value of PPV and SVV for fluid responsiveness. Threshold values for PPV and SVV were obtained using the “gray zone” approach. A p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. 56 patients were included in analysis. 41 patients (73%) responded to fluids. Both PPV and SVV tracked changes in nSI (Spearman correlation coefficients 0.34 for PPV and 0.53 for SVV). Odds ratio for fluid responsiveness for PPV was 1.163 (95% CI 1.01–1.34) and for SVV 1.341 (95% CI 1.10–1.63). PPV achieved an AUROC of 0.674 (95% CI 0.518–0.830) and SVV 0.80 (95% CI 0.668–0.932). The gray zone of PPV ranged between 6.5 and 20.5% and that of SVV between 7.5 and 13%. During pneumoperitoneum, as measured by LiDCORapid™, PPV and SVV can predict fluid responsiveness, however their sensitivity is lower than the one reported in conditions without pneumoperitoneum. Trial registry number: (with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry): ACTRN12612000456853.
引用
收藏
页码:825 / 832
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predictive values of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation for fluid responsiveness in patients with pneumoperitoneum
    Zlicar, Marko
    Novak-Jankovic, Vesna
    Blagus, Rok
    Cecconi, Maurizio
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2018, 32 (05) : 825 - 832
  • [2] Effect of pulse pressure on the predictability of stroke volume variation for fluid responsiveness in patients with coronary disease
    Kim, So Yeon
    Song, Young
    Shim, Jae Kwang
    Kwak, Young Lan
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2013, 28 (03) : 318.e1 - 318.e7
  • [3] Pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients experiencing intra-abdominal hypertension
    Liu, Xiaomei
    Fu, Qiang
    Mi, Weidong
    Liu, Henian
    Zhang, Hong
    Wang, Peiji
    BIOSCIENCE TRENDS, 2013, 7 (02) : 101 - 108
  • [4] Influence of increased intra-abdominal pressure on fluid responsiveness predicted by pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in a porcine model
    Renner, Jochen
    Gruenewald, Matthias
    Quaden, Rene
    Hanss, Robert
    Meybohm, Patrick
    Steinfath, Markus
    Scholz, Jens
    Bein, Berthold
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 37 (02) : 650 - 658
  • [5] Pressure controlled ventilation on stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients
    Ye, Weiguang
    Wang, Bin
    Wei, Limin
    Wang, Tianlong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2016, 9 (06): : 10963 - 10970
  • [6] Evaluation of stroke volume variation and pulse pressure variation as predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing protective one-lung ventilation
    Fu, Qiang
    Duan, Mingda
    Zhao, Feng
    Mi, Weidong
    DRUG DISCOVERIES AND THERAPEUTICS, 2015, 9 (04) : 296 - 302
  • [7] Reliability of pulse pressure and stroke volume variation in assessing fluid responsiveness in the operating room: a metanalysis and a metaregression
    Messina, Antonio
    Caporale, Mariagiovanna
    Calabro, Lorenzo
    Lionetti, Giulia
    Bono, Daniele
    Matronola, Guia Margherita
    Brunati, Andrea
    Frassanito, Luciano
    Morenghi, Emanuela
    Antonelli, Massimo
    Chew, Michelle S.
    Cecconi, Maurizio
    CRITICAL CARE, 2023, 27 (01)
  • [8] Reliability of pulse pressure and stroke volume variation in assessing fluid responsiveness in the operating room: a metanalysis and a metaregression
    Antonio Messina
    Mariagiovanna Caporale
    Lorenzo Calabrò
    Giulia Lionetti
    Daniele Bono
    Guia Margherita Matronola
    Andrea Brunati
    Luciano Frassanito
    Emanuela Morenghi
    Massimo Antonelli
    Michelle S. Chew
    Maurizio Cecconi
    Critical Care, 27
  • [9] Predictive value of pulse pressure variation for fluid responsiveness after maneuver to change tidal volume in patients with protective ventilatory strategy
    F Machado
    F Freitas
    M Assuncao
    B Mazza
    M Jackiu
    Critical Care, 14 (Suppl 1):
  • [10] The Changes in Pulse Pressure Variation or Stroke Volume Variation After a "Tidal Volume Challenge" Reliably Predict Fluid Responsiveness During Low Tidal Volume Ventilation
    Myatra, Sheila Nainan
    Prabu, Natesh R.
    Vasishtha, Jigeeshu
    Monnet, Xavier
    Kulkarni, Atul Prabhakar
    Teboul, Jean-Louis
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2017, 45 (03) : 415 - 421