Comparison of disc diffusion, Etest and broth microdilution for testing susceptibility of carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa to polymyxins.

被引:40
|
作者
van der Heijden I.M. [1 ]
Levin A.S. [1 ]
De Pedri E.H. [1 ]
Fung L. [1 ]
Rossi F. [1 ]
Duboc G. [1 ]
Barone A.A. [1 ]
Costa S.F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Laboratory of Medical Investigation 54, Hospital das Clinicas, University of São Paulo
关键词
Colistin; Disc Diffusion; Polymyxin; Broth Microdilution; Major Error;
D O I
10.1186/1476-0711-6-8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Considering the increasing use of polymyxins to treat infections due to multidrug resistant Gram-negative in many countries, it is important to evaluate different susceptibility testing methods to this class of antibiotic. METHODS: Susceptibility of 109 carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa to polymyxins was tested comparing broth microdilution (reference method), disc diffusion, and Etest using the new interpretative breakpoints of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. RESULTS: Twenty-nine percent of isolates belonged to endemic clone and thus, these strains were excluded of analysis. Among 78 strains evaluated, only one isolate was resistant to polymyxin B by the reference method (MIC: 8.0 microg/mL). Very major and major error rates of 1.2% and 11.5% were detected comparing polymyxin B disc diffusion with the broth microdilution (reference method). Agreement within 1 twofold dilution between Etest and the broth microdilution were 33% for polymyxin B and 79.5% for colistin. One major error and 48.7% minor errors were found comparing polymyxin B Etest with broth microdilution and only 6.4% minor errors with colistin. The concordance between Etest and the broth microdilution (reference method) was respectively 100% for colistin and 90% for polymyxin B. CONCLUSION: Resistance to polymyxins seems to be rare among hospital carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates over a six-year period. Our results showed, using the new CLSI criteria, that the disc diffusion susceptibility does not report major errors (false-resistant results) for colistin. On the other hand, showed a high frequency of minor errors and 1 very major error for polymyxin B. Etest presented better results for colistin than polymyxin B. Until these results are reproduced with a large number of polymyxins-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates, susceptibility to polymyxins should be confirmed by a reference method.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Polymyxin B resistance rates in carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates and a comparison between Etest(R) and broth microdilution methods of antimicrobial susceptibility testing
    Chen, Xu
    Xu, Jie
    Zhu, Qiongfang
    Ren, Yalu
    Zhao, Lina
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2020, 20 (02) : 762 - 769
  • [2] Evaluation of Sensititre Broth Microdilution Plate for determining the susceptibility of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae to polymyxins
    Richter, Sandra S.
    Karichu, James
    Otiso, Joshua
    Van Heule, Hillary
    Keller, George
    Cober, Eric
    Rojas, Laura J.
    Hujer, Andrea M.
    Hujer, Kristine M.
    Marshall, Steve
    Perez, Frederico
    Rudin, Susan D.
    Domitrovic, T. Nicholas
    Kaye, Keith S.
    Salata, Robert
    van Duin, David
    Bonomo, Robert A.
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2018, 91 (01) : 89 - 92
  • [3] Colistin and Polymyxin B Susceptibility Testing for Carbapenem-Resistant and mcr-Positive Enterobacteriaceae: Comparison of Sensititre, MicroScan, Vitek 2, and Etest with Broth Microdilution
    Chew, Ka Lip
    La, My-Van
    Lin, Raymond T. P.
    Teo, Jeanette W. P.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2017, 55 (09) : 2609 - 2616
  • [4] Comparison of BD Phoenix and disk diffusion to broth microdilution for determining cefepime susceptibility among carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales
    Fouad, Aliaa
    Simner, Patricia J.
    Nicolau, David P.
    Asempa, Tomefa E.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2024, 62 (06)
  • [5] Comparative Evaluation of Colistin-Susceptibility Testing in Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Using VITEK, Colistin Broth Disc Elution, and Colistin Broth Microdilution
    Antony, Tessa
    Senthilnathan, Yugadharshini
    Madhavakumar, Rukmani
    Amudhan, Premika
    Venkataraman, Shruthi
    Rally, Sanjana
    Pitani, Ravi S.
    Arumugam, Ilakkiya
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (07)
  • [6] Comparison of Disc Diffusion, Etest, and a Modified CLSI Broth Microdilution Method for In Vitro Susceptibility Testing of Itraconazole, Posaconazole, and Voriconazole against Madurella mycetomatis
    Nyuykonge, Bertrand
    van Amelsvoort, Lukas
    Eadie, Kimberly
    Fahal, Ahmed H.
    Verbon, Annelies
    van de Sande, Wendy
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2021, 65 (09)
  • [7] In-vitro Susceptibility Testing Methods for Ceftazidime-avibactam against Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales: Comparison with Reference Broth Microdilution Method
    Sharma, Bhawna
    Sreenivasan, Priya
    Angrup, Archana
    Kaur, Satinder
    Rana, Sudesh
    Kundu, Jyoti
    Biswal, Manisha
    Ray, Pallab
    CURRENT DRUG SAFETY, 2023, 18 (04) : 563 - 570
  • [8] Comparison of broth microdilution and Etest® methods for susceptibility testing of amphotericin B in Candida auris
    De Luca, Domenica G.
    Li, Xiao Rui
    Alexander, David C.
    Dingle, Tanis C.
    Dufresne, Philippe J.
    Hoang, Linda M.
    Kus, Julianne, V
    Sheitoyan-Pesant, Caroline
    Bharat, Amrita
    MEDICAL MYCOLOGY, 2025, 63 (03)
  • [9] Comparison of Broth Microdilution Method with BD Phoenix, Micro Scan and E-test for Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales: Colistin Susceptibility Testing
    Yis, Reyhan
    JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN MEDICINE-JAREM, 2022, 12 (02): : 61 - 65
  • [10] Comparison Between Etest and Broth Microdilution Methods for Testing Itraconazole-Resistant Aspergillus fumigatus Susceptibility to Antifungal Combinations
    Laura Bedin Denardi
    Jéssica Tairine Keller
    Maria Isabel de Azevedo
    Vanessa Oliveira
    Fernanda Baldissera Piasentin
    Cecília Bittencourt Severo
    Janio Morais Santurio
    Sydney Hartz Alves
    Mycopathologia, 2018, 183 : 359 - 370