What We (Don't) Know so Far About Tolerance Towards Corruption in European Democracies: Measurement Approaches, Determinants, and Types

被引:0
作者
Gustavo Gouvêa Maciel
机构
[1] University of Lisbon (ICS-UL),Institute of Social Sciences
来源
Social Indicators Research | 2021年 / 157卷
关键词
Corruption tolerance; Democracy; Europe; Public opinion; Measurement; Typology;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Cross-national survey data shows that for a significant share of European citizens, corruption is acceptable. Notwithstanding the importance of prior knowledge on corruption extension and experience, research has made little progress in exploring why people condone it, especially in unsuspicious countries, with effective institutions and stable democratic rules and processes. The present study examines this gap in the literature by assessing the European Values Study (EVS) and the Special Eurobarometer (EB) attempts at measuring ‘Tolerance towards Corruption’ (TtC) in OECD countries in Europe during the same period (2017–2019). In the end, measurements proved to be constrained by the limited number of questions/items that try to capture TtC, which gave room to conclude that: (a) EVS and EB approaches do not measure the same TtC. The first measures it through social transgressions not exclusively related to corruption, while the second measures the willingness to accept a public-office corruption when dealing with the public sphere. (b) Lower ages combined with individual preferences/perceptions of less satisfaction with life, widespread corruption, and prior experiences with corruption proved to be more relevant to explain TtC, regardless of the country in which individuals were surveyed. (c) The type of TtC citizens display in advanced democracies proved to be mainly contingent on their age and on the way they interpret the extension of corruption and the prior contact they had with a public-office corruption in a given society.
引用
收藏
页码:1131 / 1153
页数:22
相关论文
共 88 条
  • [1] Alldridge P(1990)Rules for courts and rules for citizens Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 10 487-504
  • [2] Allen N(2012)On either side of a moat? Elite and mass attitudes towards right and wrong European Journal of Political Research 51 89-116
  • [3] Birch S(1984)Paradoxes de la corruption politique Pouvoirs, Revue Française D’études Constitutionnelles et Politiques 31 19-36
  • [4] Becquart-Leclercq J(2021)Measuring corruption: A critical analysis of the existing datasets and their suitability for diachronic transnational research Social Indicators Research 22 191-208
  • [5] Bello y Villarino JM(2009)Do the right thing: but only if others do so Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 70 1-15
  • [6] Bicchieri C(2020)A critique on the corruption perceptions index: An interdisciplinary approach Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 128 1239-1258
  • [7] Xiao E(2016)Multidimensional similarities at a global scale: An approach to mapping open society orientations Social Indicators Research 18 31-48
  • [8] Budsaratragoon P(2005)The individual bases of political trust: Trends in new and established democracies International Journal of Public Opinion Research 12 27-44
  • [9] Jitmaneeroj B(2016)Corruption experience, corruption tolerance, and institutional trust in East Asian Democracies Taiwan Journal of Democracy 30 67-84
  • [10] Buscema M(2017)An insider-outsider theory of popular tolerance for corrupt politicians Governance 45 1304-1312