Stochastic vs. deterministic frontier distance output function: Evidence from Brazilian higher education institutions

被引:0
作者
Ariel Gustavo Letti
Mauricio Vaz Lobo Bittencourt
Luis E. Vila
机构
[1] Universidade do Estado da Bahia (UNEB),
[2] Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR),undefined
[3] Universitat de València (UV),undefined
来源
Journal of Productivity Analysis | 2022年 / 58卷
关键词
Higher Education; Efficiency; SFA; DEA; Brazil; I23; D24; H52; C33; C61;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Using data from the Brazilian Higher Education Census and other public institutions, this study aims to obtain and compare efficiency scores from stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) and data envelopment analysis (DEA) models for 56 Brazilian federal universities for the period of 2010 to 2016. The output distance function includes financial and human resources as inputs, and teaching, research, patents and third mission activities as outputs. The research is innovative considering: (i) the estimation of SFA for Brazilian universities as whole institutions, (ii) its comparison with DEA; and (iii) the inclusion of patents and third mission variables. The findings suggest there is inefficiency in Brazilian higher education production, with a very small increase through time and with some influence from universities and environmental characteristics. Thus, consolidated traditional institutions with university hospitals tend to be more efficient than the younger ones. The values and the rank of the efficiencies are sensitive to the model/method employed, presenting highly significant although modest correlations. In general, the inclusion of third mission activities improves the efficiencies for both approaches, mainly for DEA. Hence, as advised in other international comparative analyses, caution is required when deriving management and policy recommendations from the analytical results.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 74
页数:19
相关论文
共 74 条
  • [11] Petrushchenko VV(2000)Technical efficiency of European railways: a distance function approach Appl Econ 32 1967-1976
  • [12] Andrews DF(1957)The measurement of productive efficiency J Royal Statistical Soc 120 253-281
  • [13] Pregibon D(2018)Economic interpretation of DEA Socio-Econ Planning Sci 61 9-15
  • [14] Battese GE(1980)A survey of frontier production functions and of their relationship to efficiency measurement J Econom 13 5-25
  • [15] Coelli TJ(2017)Stochastic frontier models with dependent errors based on normal and exponential margins Revista de Métodos Quantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa 23 3-23
  • [16] Battese GE(1997)On the cost of educating a medical student Acad Med 72 200-210
  • [17] Coelli TJ(2006)Data envelopment analysis and its application to the measurement of efficiency in higher education Econ Educ Rev 25 273-288
  • [18] Battese GE(2011)Differences in cost structure and the evaluation of efficiency: the case of German universities Edu Econ 19 487-499
  • [19] Coelli TJ(1982)On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model J Econom 19 233-238
  • [20] Castano M(2013)SFA vs. DEA for measuring helthcare efficiency: a systematic review Int J Statistics Medical Res 2 152-166