“Bring Your Own Device” (BYOD): The Future of Field-Based Patient-Reported Outcome Data Collection in Clinical Trials?

被引:0
|
作者
Chad Gwaltney
Stephen Joel Coons
Paul O’Donohoe
Hannah O’Gorman
Matthew Denomey
Cindy Howry
Jennifer Ross
机构
[1] ERT/Brown University,PRO Consortium
[2] Critical Path Institute,undefined
[3] CRF Health,undefined
[4] Exco InTouch,undefined
[5] ICON,undefined
[6] YPrime,undefined
[7] Almac Clinical Technologies,undefined
来源
Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science | 2015年 / 49卷
关键词
clinical outcome assessments; patient-reported outcomes; electronic data capture; smartphone apps; diaries; study endpoints;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Field-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessments, including measures of signs, symptoms, and events that are administered outside of the research clinic, can be critical in evaluating the efficacy and safety of new medical treatments. Collection of this type of data commonly involves providing subjects with stand-alone electronic devices, such as smartphones, that they can use to respond to assessments in their home or work environment. Although this approach has proven useful, it is also limited in several ways: For example, provisioning stand-alone devices can be costly for sponsors, and requiring subjects to carry a device that is exclusively dedicated to the study can be burdensome. The “Bring Your Own Device” (BYOD) approach, in which subjects use their own smartphone or Internet-enabled device to complete field-based PRO assessments, addresses many of these concerns. However, the BYOD model has its own limitations that should be considered. In this article, representatives of the ePRO Consortium review operational, privacy/security, and scientific/regulatory considerations regarding BYOD. We hope that this review will allow researchers to make informed decisions when choosing methods to collect field-based PRO data in future clinical trials. Additionally, we hope that the discussion in this article will establish a research agenda for further examination of BYOD approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:783 / 791
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The use of computer touch-screen technology for the collection of patient-reported outcome data in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with standardized paper questionnaires
    Salaffi, F.
    Gasparini, S.
    Grassi, W.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2009, 27 (03) : 459 - 468
  • [22] International perspectives on suboptimal patient-reported outcome trial design and reporting in cancer clinical trials: A qualitative study
    Retzer, Ameeta
    Calvert, Melanie
    Ahmed, Khaled
    Keeley, Thomas
    Armes, Jo
    Brown, Julia M.
    Calman, Lynn
    Gavin, Anna
    Glaser, Adam W.
    Greenfield, Diana M.
    Lanceley, Anne
    Taylor, Rachel M.
    Velikova, Galina
    Brundage, Michael
    Efficace, Fabio
    Mercieca-Bebber, Rebecca
    King, Madeleine T.
    Kyte, Derek
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (16): : 5475 - 5487
  • [23] Information about missing patient-reported outcome data in breast cancer trials is frequently not documented: a scoping review
    Krepper, Daniela
    Giesinger, Johannes Maria
    Dirven, Linda
    Efficace, Fabio
    Martini, Caroline
    Thurner, Anna Margarete Maria
    Al-Naesan, Imad
    Gross, Franziska
    Sztankay, Monika Judith
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2023, 162 : 1 - 9
  • [24] Patient-reported outcome instruments used in immune-checkpoint inhibitor clinical trials in oncology: a systematic review
    Colomer-Lahiguera, Sara
    Bryant-Lukosius, Denise
    Rietkoetter, Sarah
    Martelli, Lorraine
    Ribi, Karin
    Fitzpatrick-Lewis, Donna
    Sherifali, Diana
    Orcurto, Angela
    Juergens, Rosalyn
    Eicher, Manuela
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2020, 4 (01)
  • [25] Patient-reported outcome instruments used in immune-checkpoint inhibitor clinical trials in oncology: a systematic review
    Sara Colomer-Lahiguera
    Denise Bryant-Lukosius
    Sarah Rietkoetter
    Lorraine Martelli
    Karin Ribi
    Donna Fitzpatrick-Lewis
    Diana Sherifali
    Angela Orcurto
    Rosalyn Juergens
    Manuela Eicher
    Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 4
  • [26] The design, implementation, and impact of an automated patient-reported outcome data collection and adverse event surveillance tool: a randomized trial
    Zhou, Megan S.
    Jain, Tanya
    Hardy, Nick
    Perez-Segura, Alejandro
    Hickman, Jasmine
    Leopold, Laurey
    Qualliotine, Kerry
    Yedidi, Raagini S.
    Whetsell, Matthew
    Broffman, Lauren
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [27] The design, implementation, and impact of an automated patient-reported outcome data collection and adverse event surveillance tool: a randomized trial
    Megan S. Zhou
    Tanya Jain
    Nick Hardy
    Alejandro Perez-Segura
    Jasmine Hickman
    Laurey Leopold
    Kerry Qualliotine
    Raagini S. Yedidi
    Matthew Whetsell
    Lauren Broffman
    BMC Health Services Research, 23
  • [28] Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement in Clinical Dermatological Practice: Relevance and Feasibility of a Web-Based Portal
    van Cranenburgh, Oda D.
    ter Stege, Jacqueline A.
    de Korte, John
    de Rie, Menno A.
    Sprangers, Mirjam A. G.
    Smets, Ellen M. A.
    DERMATOLOGY, 2016, 232 (01) : 64 - 70
  • [29] A cross-sectional study on the application of patient-reported outcome measurements in clinical trials of traditional Chinese medicine in mainland China
    Dong, Yue
    Liu, Lin
    Zhang, Xiaowen
    Gong, Yijia
    Yan, Shiyan
    Li, Wei
    Li, Shunping
    Rong, Hongguo
    Liu, Jianping
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [30] Patient-reported outcome measures for systemic lupus erythematosus clinical trials: a review of content validity, face validity and psychometric performance
    Holloway, Laura
    Humphrey, Louise
    Heron, Louise
    Pilling, Claire
    Kitchen, Helen
    Hojbjerre, Lise
    Strandberg-Larsen, Martin
    Hansen, Brian Bekker
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2014, 12