Mate-by-Numbers: Budget, Mating Context, and Sex Predict Preferences for Facial and Bodily Traits

被引:0
作者
Carin Perilloux
Jaime M. Cloud
机构
[1] Southwestern University,Department of Psychology
[2] Western Oregon University,Psychological Sciences Department
来源
Evolutionary Psychological Science | 2019年 / 5卷
关键词
Physical attractiveness; Mate preferences; Face; Body; Traits; Evolution;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Unlike women, or men considering long-term mates, men pursuing short-term mating have shown a tendency to prioritize bodily information over facial information when assessing potential mates. Prior studies have documented this tendency across a variety of methods ranging from photograph ratings to forcing a choice between faces and bodies, but have yet to ask participants to prioritize individual traits in faces and bodies. The current study used a budget allocation method to do just that. We randomly assigned participants (N = 258) to a mating context (short-term or long-term) and a budget (high or low) and asked them to allocate points across 10 traits (five facial, five bodily) to design their ideal mate within their budget. As expected, men in the short-term mating context allocated more points to bodily traits, but only when in the low budget condition—in the high budget condition, men showed more interest in facial traits. Women, also as expected, and in contrast to men, showed a general trend toward favoring facial traits regardless of budget and condition. Overall, the results are consistent with the hypothesis that women’s bodies provide better information regarding immediate fertility and are thus more important for men to assess in short-term mating contexts.
引用
收藏
页码:294 / 299
页数:5
相关论文
共 87 条
[1]  
Bleske-Rechek A(2011)Physical cues of ovulatory status: A failure to replicate enhanced facial attractiveness and reduced waist-to-hip ratio at high fertility Evolutionary Psychology 9 336-353
[2]  
Harris HD(1984)Marital assortment for personality dispositions: Assessment with three data sources Behavior Genetics 14 111-123
[3]  
Denkinge K(1989)Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 1-49
[4]  
Webb RM(2008)Attractive women want it all: Good genes, economic investment, parenting proclivities, and emotional commitment Evolutionary Psychology 6 134-146
[5]  
Erickson L(2015)“Drawing” conclusions about perceptions of ideal male and female body shapes Evolutionary Psychological Science 1 163-171
[6]  
Nelson LA(2010)More than just a pretty face: Men’s priority shifts toward bodily attractiveness in short-term versus long-term mating contexts Evolution and Human Behavior 31 348-353
[7]  
Buss DM(2009)The relative importance of the face and body in judgments of human physical attractiveness Evolution and Human Behavior 30 409-416
[8]  
Buss DM(2016)Mating markets and bargaining hands: Mate preferences for attractiveness and resources in two national US studies Personality and Individual Differences 88 78-87
[9]  
Buss DM(2007)Male facial appearance signals physical strength to women American Journal of Human Biology 19 82-87
[10]  
Shackelford TK(1992)Parasites, bright males, and the immunocompetence handicap The American Naturalist 139 603-622