Diagnosis of adverse local tissue reactions following metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty

被引：37

作者：

Chalmers B.P. ^{[1
]}

Perry K.I. ^{[1
]}

Taunton M.J. ^{[1
]}

Mabry T.M. ^{[1
]}

Abdel M.P. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street S.W, Rochester, 55905, MN

来源：

Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine | 2016年 / 9卷 / 1期

关键词：

Adverse local tissue reactions (ALTRs); Aseptic lymphocytic vasculitic-associated lesion (ALVAL); Metal-on-metal (MOM); Pseudotumor; Total hip arthroplasty (THA);

D O I：

10.1007/s12178-016-9321-3

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Metal-on-metal (MOM) bearing surfaces in hip arthroplasty have distinct advantages that led to the increase in popularity in North America in the early 2000s. However, with their increased use, concerns such as local cytotoxicity and hypersensitivity reactions leading to soft tissue damage and cystic mass formation (known collectively as adverse local tissue reactions (ALTR)) became apparent. The clinical presentation of ALTR is highly variable. The diagnosis of ALTR in MOM articulations in hip arthroplasty can be challenging and a combination of clinical presentation, physical examination, implant track record, component positioning, serum metal ion levels, cross-sectional imaging, histopathologic analysis, and consideration of alternative diagnoses are essential. © 2016, Springer Science+Business Media New York.

引用

页码：67 / 74

页数：7

共 41 条

[1]

Fehring K.A., Fehring T.K., Modes of failure in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty, Orthop Clin North Am, 46, pp. 185-192, (2015)

[2]

Bozic K.J., Kurtz S., Lau E., Ong K., Chiu V., Vail T.P., Et al., The epidemiology of bearing surface usage in total hip arthroplasty in the United States, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 91, pp. 1614-1620, (2009)

[3]

Jacobs J.J., Urban R.M., Hallab N.J., Skipor A.K., Fischer A., Wimmer M.A., Metal-on-metal bearing surfaces, J. Am. Acad. Orthop Surg, 17, pp. 69-76, (2009)

[4]

Anissian H.L., Stark A., Good V., Dahlstrand H., Clarke I.C., The wear pattern in metal-on-metal hip prostheses, J Biomed Mater Res, 58, pp. 673-678, (2001)

[5]

Kwon Y.-M., Jacobs J.J., MacDonald S.J., Potter H.G., Fehring T.K., Lombardi A.V., Evidence-based understanding of management perils for metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients, J Arthroplasty, 27, pp. 20-25, (2012)

[6]

Nawabi D.H., Nassif N.A., Do H.T., Stoner K., Elpers M., Su E.P., Et al., What causes unexplained pain in patients with metal-on metal hip devices? A retrieval, histologic, and imaging analysis, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 472, pp. 543-554, (2014)

[7]

Natu S., Sidaginamale R.P., Gandhi J., Langton D.J., Nargola V.F., Adverse reactions to metal debris: histopathological features of periprosthetic soft tissue reactions seen in association with failed metal on metal hip arthroplasties, J Clin Pathol, 65, pp. 409-418, (2012)

[8]

Hayter C.L., Gold S.L., Koff M.F., Perino G., Nawabi D.H., Miller T.T., Et al., MRI findings in painful metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty, Am J Roentgenol, 199, pp. 884-893, (2012)

[9]

Hauptfleisch J., Pandit H., Grammatopoulos G., Gill H.S., Murray D.W., Ostlere S., A MRI classification of periprosthetic soft tissue masses (pseudotumours) associated with metal-on-metal resurfacing hip arthroplasty, Skelet Radiol, 41, pp. 149-155, (2012)

[10]

Grammatopoulos G., Pandit H., Orth F., Kamali A., Maggiani F., Athanasou N., The correlation of wear with histological features, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 81, pp. 1-10, (2013)

← 1 2 3 4 5 →