The Validity of Using the Microscopic Hyperbolic Heat Conduction Model Under a Harmonic Fluctuating Boundary Heating Source

The validity of using the microscopic hyperbolic heat conduction model under a harmonic fluctuating boundary heating source is investigated. It is found that using the microscopic hyperbolic heat conduction model is essential when \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} $$\frac{{\bar \omega C_l }}{G} >0.1$$ \end{document}. The phase shift between the electron-gas and solid-lattice temperatures is found to be \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} $${tan}^-1 \left( {\frac{{\bar \omega C_l }}{G}} \right)$$ \end{document}. This phase shift reaches a fixed value of 1.5708 rad at very large values of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} $$\frac{{\bar \omega C_l }}{G}$$ \end{document}. It is found that the use of the microscopic hyperbolic heat conduction model is essential when ¯ω>1×109 rad⋅s−1 for most metallic layers independent of their thickness.