Approaches to carbon allowance allocation in China: a computable general equilibrium analysis

被引:0
作者
Yun-Fei Yao
Qiao-Mei Liang
机构
[1] Sinopec,Sinopec Research Institute of Petroleum Engineering
[2] Beijing Institute of Technology,Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research
[3] Beijing Institute of Technology,School of Management and Economics
[4] Collaborative Innovation Center of Electric Vehicles in Beijing,undefined
来源
Natural Hazards | 2016年 / 84卷
关键词
Emissions trade; Primary allowance allocation; Computable general equilibrium; Climate policy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
China is preparing to develop and implement an emissions trading system in its 13th five-year plan. Allowance allocation is one of the key issues to settle during the establishment of this system. This study applies the China Energy and Environmental Policy Analysis model to assess how the allowances should be allocated. Simulation results show that, while impacts on China’s economic development vary according to how allowances are allocated, the negative impacts cannot be mitigated completely, which are between −0.5 and −0.1 % when 5 % of carbon emissions are reduced. In terms of the impacts on the macroeconomy, sectoral output, and capital revenue, results suggest that auctioning the allowances and recycling the revenue to reduce the indirect tax will perform best in alleviating the negative impacts. Meanwhile, impacts of carbon mitigation on international competitiveness can be reduced most in the approach where only key energy- and trade-intensive sectors are able to receive free allowances. However, if citizens’ welfare and quality of life is prioritized, auctioning the allowance and transferring the revenue to households in proportion to their occupation will be the most effective approach; in this case, the negative impacts on rural households’ disposable incomes and welfare will be reduced, and the income gap between rural and urban households will be narrowed.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 351
页数:18
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
Cho GL(2010)Allocation and banking in Korean permits trading Resour Policy 35 36-46
[2]  
Kim HS(2010)Potential impact of carbon emissions trading (CET) on China’s power sector: a perspective from different allowance allocation options Energy 35 3921-3931
[3]  
Kim YD(2002)Tradeable carbon permit auctions How and why to auction not grandfather Energy Policy 30 333-345
[4]  
Cong RG(2001)Allocation of carbon permits within a country: a general equilibrium analysis of the United Kingdom Energy Econ 23 371-386
[5]  
Wei YM(2001)Carbon taxes and carbon emissions trading J Econ Surv 15 325-376
[6]  
Cramton P(2005)Coal cleaning: a viable strategy for reduced carbon emissions and improved environment in China? Energy Policy 33 525-542
[7]  
Kerr S(2010)Impacts of alternative emissions allowance allocation methods under a federal cap-and-trade program J Environ Econ Manag 60 161-181
[8]  
Edwards TH(2011)The effect of allowance allocations on cap-and-trade system performance J Law Econ 54 S267-S294
[9]  
Hutton JP(2011)Effective, efficient or equitable: using allowance allocations to mitigate emissions leakage Clim Policy 11 1113-1130
[10]  
Ekins P(2000)Allocation of CO emissions permits: a general equilibrium analysis of policy instruments J Environ Econ Manag 40 111-136