A Systematic Review of Parent–Child Communication Measures: Instruments and Their Psychometric Properties

被引:0
作者
Holger Zapf
Johannes Boettcher
Yngvild Haukeland
Stian Orm
Sarah Coslar
Silke Wiegand-Grefe
Krister Fjermestad
机构
[1] University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
[2] University of Oslo,Department of Psychology
[3] Innlandet Hospital Trust,Division Mental Health Care
[4] University of Groningen,Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences
来源
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review | 2023年 / 26卷
关键词
Parent–child communication; Adolescents; Parents; Systematic review;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Parent–child communication represents an important variable in clinical child and family psychology due to its association with a variety of psychosocial outcomes. To give an overview of instruments designed to measure the quality of parent–child communication from the child’s (8–21 years) perspective and to assess the psychometric quality of these instruments, we performed a systematic literature search in Medline and PsycInfo (last: February 25, 2022). Peer-reviewed journal articles published in English with a child-rated instrument measuring the quality of parent–child communication were included. Initial screening for eligibility and inclusion, subsequent data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted by couples of review team members. Based on the screening of 5115 articles, 106 studies reported in 126 papers were included. We identified 12 parent–child communication instruments across the studies. The Parent-Adolescent Communication Scale (PACS) was used in 75% of the studies. On average, the evidence for psychometric quality of the instruments was low. Few instruments were used in clinical and at-risk samples. Several instruments are available to rate parent–child communication from the child’s perspective. However, their psychometric evidence is limited and the theoretical foundation is largely undocumented. This review has limitations with regard to selection criteria and language bias.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 142
页数:21
相关论文
共 137 条
  • [1] Achenbach TM(1987)Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: Implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity Psychological Bulletin 101 213-232
  • [2] McConaughy SH(1980)Socialization and attribution processes: Actual versus perceived similarity among parents and youth Journal of Marriage and Family 42 501-515
  • [3] Howell CT(1999)Adolescent storm and stress, reconsidered American Psychologist 54 317-326
  • [4] Acock A(1985)Parent–adolescent communication and the circumplex model Child Development 56 438-447
  • [5] Bengtson V(1969)Measurement of parent-adolescent communication Family Coordinator 18 117-121
  • [6] Arnett JJ(2011)A three-level model of parent-child communication: Theory, scale and application in Chinese 5th and 6th graders [Chinese] Psychological Development and Education 2 140-150
  • [7] Barnes HL(2005)Informant discrepancies in the assessment of childhood psychopathology: A critical review, theoretical framework, and recommendations for further study Psychological Bulletin 131 483-509
  • [8] Olson DH(2018)Assessment and the Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology’s evidence base updates series: Evaluating the tools for gathering evidence Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology 47 357-365
  • [9] Bienvenu MJ(2021)Parenting as a communication process: Integrating interpersonal communication theory and parenting styles conceptualization Journal of Family Theory & Review 13 21-33
  • [10] Chi L-P(2020)Working the limits of “giving voice” to children: A critical conceptual review International Journal of Qualitative Methods 19 1609406920933391-76