Research governance: new hope for ethics committees?

被引:0
作者
Frew D. [1 ]
Martlew A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Health Research and Ethics Branch, New South Wales Health.
关键词
Research Governance; Monash Bioethic Review; Institutional Requirement; Area Health Service; Privacy Principle;
D O I
10.1007/BF03351463
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
For many years there has been discussion regarding the problems confronting our current ethics review system. Commentators have identified numerous issues that threaten the sustainability of Australia's voluntary HREC system. Various ad hoc solutions to these problems have been posed, but have not resulted in any significant advances. However, in recent years, discourse regarding research governance has become prominent in the Australian research environment. The application of research governance principles is gaining momentum amongst the regulators of research, including research institutions and their governing bureaucracies. We argue that this is potentially the most significant development in several years towards creating a sustainable HREC system in Australia. The recognition by research institutions and their governing bureaucracies that the responsibility for overall research governance lies with them, rather than solely with their HRECs, is leading to a range of initiatives which should significantly lessen the burden on Australian ethics committees, and improve their ability to undertake their core task of reviewing the ethical aspects of research proposals.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 23
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A double-edged sword? Health research and research governance in UK primary care
    Shawa, Sara E.
    Petchey, Roland P.
    Chapman, Jenifer
    Abbott, Stephen
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2009, 68 (05) : 912 - 918
  • [42] Local authorities need tailored research ethics processes to support research capacity building
    Levitas, A.
    Taylor, E.
    Navelle, P. L.
    Humphreys, E.
    Sheringham, J.
    PUBLIC HEALTH IN PRACTICE, 2025, 9
  • [43] Indigenous health research ethics in Australia: applying guidelines as the basis for negotiating research agreements
    Terry Dunbar
    Margaret Scrimgeour
    Monash Bioethics Review, 2006, 25 (2) : S53 - S62
  • [44] The impact of European research ethics legislation on UK radiology research activity: a bibliometric analysis
    Johnson, C. A.
    Toms, A. P.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2009, 64 (10) : 983 - 987
  • [45] The ‘Economy of Memory’: Publications, Citations, and the Paradox of Effective Research Governance
    Peter Woelert
    Minerva, 2013, 51 : 341 - 362
  • [46] ETHICAL REVIEW OF RESEARCH ON HUMAN SUBJECTS AT UNILEVER: REFLECTIONS ON GOVERNANCE
    Sheehan, Mark
    Marti, Vernon
    Roberts, Tony
    BIOETHICS, 2014, 28 (06) : 284 - 292
  • [47] Governance of social science research: Insights from Southeast Asia
    Fussy, D. S.
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2023, 51 (02) : 71 - 79
  • [48] Public involvement and health research system governance: a qualitative study
    Miller, Fiona Alice
    Patton, Sarah J.
    Dobrow, Mark
    Marshall, Deborah A.
    Berta, Whitney
    HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2018, 16
  • [49] Public involvement and health research system governance: a qualitative study
    Fiona Alice Miller
    Sarah J. Patton
    Mark Dobrow
    Deborah A. Marshall
    Whitney Berta
    Health Research Policy and Systems, 16
  • [50] International research ethics guidelines to be revised — in nearly complete secrecy
    Udo Schüklenk
    Monash Bioethics Review, 1999, 18 (3) : S18 - S21