Research governance: new hope for ethics committees?

被引:0
作者
Frew D. [1 ]
Martlew A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Health Research and Ethics Branch, New South Wales Health.
关键词
Research Governance; Monash Bioethic Review; Institutional Requirement; Area Health Service; Privacy Principle;
D O I
10.1007/BF03351463
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
For many years there has been discussion regarding the problems confronting our current ethics review system. Commentators have identified numerous issues that threaten the sustainability of Australia's voluntary HREC system. Various ad hoc solutions to these problems have been posed, but have not resulted in any significant advances. However, in recent years, discourse regarding research governance has become prominent in the Australian research environment. The application of research governance principles is gaining momentum amongst the regulators of research, including research institutions and their governing bureaucracies. We argue that this is potentially the most significant development in several years towards creating a sustainable HREC system in Australia. The recognition by research institutions and their governing bureaucracies that the responsibility for overall research governance lies with them, rather than solely with their HRECs, is leading to a range of initiatives which should significantly lessen the burden on Australian ethics committees, and improve their ability to undertake their core task of reviewing the ethical aspects of research proposals.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 23
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [32] 'Closer to the Market': EU Research Governance and Symbolic Power
    Gengnagel, Vincent
    Zimmermann, Katharina
    Buettner, Sebastian M.
    JCMS-JOURNAL OF COMMON MARKET STUDIES, 2022, 60 (06) : 1573 - 1591
  • [33] Rapid set up of research centres in a trial in an evolving research governance world
    Sharon Ruddock
    Bipin Bhakta
    Amanda Lilley-Kelly
    Suzanne Hartley
    Lorna Barnard
    Trials, 14 (Suppl 1)
  • [34] Public involvement in health research systems: a governance framework
    Fiona Alice Miller
    Sarah J. Patton
    Mark Dobrow
    Whitney Berta
    Health Research Policy and Systems, 16
  • [35] RESEARCH GOVERNANCE IN A MODERN UNIVERSITY IN THE CONDITIONS OF OPEN SCIENCE
    Drach, Iryna I.
    Lytvynova, Svitlana H.
    INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES AND LEARNING TOOLS, 2020, 80 (06) : 326 - 345
  • [36] Public involvement in health research systems: a governance framework
    Miller, Fiona Alice
    Patton, Sarah J.
    Dobrow, Mark
    Berta, Whitney
    HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2018, 16
  • [37] The impact of research governance in healthcare and higher education organizations
    Howarth, ML
    Kneafsey, R
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2005, 49 (06) : 675 - 683
  • [38] Ethics into Violence and Abuse Research - a Positive Empowerment Approach
    Downes, Julia
    Kelly, Liz
    Westmarland, Nicole
    SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH ONLINE, 2014, 19 (01): : 29 - 41
  • [39] How the NHS research governance procedures could be modified to greatly strengthen clinical research
    Haynes, Richard
    Bowman, Louise
    Rahimi, Kazem
    Armitage, Jane
    CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2010, 10 (02) : 127 - 129
  • [40] The red tape waltz. Where multi-centre ethical and research governance review can step on the toes of good research practice.
    Webster S.M.
    Temple-Smit M.
    Monash Bioethics Review, 2013, 31 (1) : 77 - 98