Research Governance;
Monash Bioethic Review;
Institutional Requirement;
Area Health Service;
Privacy Principle;
D O I:
10.1007/BF03351463
中图分类号:
学科分类号:
摘要:
For many years there has been discussion regarding the problems confronting our current ethics review system. Commentators have identified numerous issues that threaten the sustainability of Australia's voluntary HREC system. Various ad hoc solutions to these problems have been posed, but have not resulted in any significant advances. However, in recent years, discourse regarding research governance has become prominent in the Australian research environment. The application of research governance principles is gaining momentum amongst the regulators of research, including research institutions and their governing bureaucracies. We argue that this is potentially the most significant development in several years towards creating a sustainable HREC system in Australia. The recognition by research institutions and their governing bureaucracies that the responsibility for overall research governance lies with them, rather than solely with their HRECs, is leading to a range of initiatives which should significantly lessen the burden on Australian ethics committees, and improve their ability to undertake their core task of reviewing the ethical aspects of research proposals.
机构:
University of Technology Sydney,Centre for Research on Education in a Digital Society (CREDS) SchoolUniversity of Technology Sydney,Centre for Research on Education in a Digital Society (CREDS) School
Simon Knight
Antonette Shibani
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
TD School,undefinedUniversity of Technology Sydney,Centre for Research on Education in a Digital Society (CREDS) School
Antonette Shibani
Nicole Vincent
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
University of Technology Sydney,Centre for Research on Education in a Digital Society (CREDS) SchoolUniversity of Technology Sydney,Centre for Research on Education in a Digital Society (CREDS) School