Research governance: new hope for ethics committees?

被引:0
|
作者
Frew D. [1 ]
Martlew A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Health Research and Ethics Branch, New South Wales Health.
关键词
Research Governance; Monash Bioethic Review; Institutional Requirement; Area Health Service; Privacy Principle;
D O I
10.1007/BF03351463
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
For many years there has been discussion regarding the problems confronting our current ethics review system. Commentators have identified numerous issues that threaten the sustainability of Australia's voluntary HREC system. Various ad hoc solutions to these problems have been posed, but have not resulted in any significant advances. However, in recent years, discourse regarding research governance has become prominent in the Australian research environment. The application of research governance principles is gaining momentum amongst the regulators of research, including research institutions and their governing bureaucracies. We argue that this is potentially the most significant development in several years towards creating a sustainable HREC system in Australia. The recognition by research institutions and their governing bureaucracies that the responsibility for overall research governance lies with them, rather than solely with their HRECs, is leading to a range of initiatives which should significantly lessen the burden on Australian ethics committees, and improve their ability to undertake their core task of reviewing the ethical aspects of research proposals.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 23
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Research governance: panacea or problem?
    Samanta, A
    Samanta, J
    CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2005, 5 (03) : 235 - 239
  • [22] Centralization and research governance: does it work?
    Howarth, Michelle
    Kneafsey, Rosie
    Haigh, Carol
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2008, 61 (04) : 363 - 372
  • [23] The politics and governance of research into solar geoengineering
    McLaren, Duncan
    Corry, Olaf
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE, 2021, 12 (03)
  • [24] The ‘paradox of interdisciplinarity’ in Australian research governance
    Peter Woelert
    Victoria Millar
    Higher Education, 2013, 66 : 755 - 767
  • [25] The 'paradox of interdisciplinarity' in Australian research governance
    Woelert, Peter
    Millar, Victoria
    HIGHER EDUCATION, 2013, 66 (06) : 755 - 767
  • [26] The ethics of reproductive and therapeutic cloning (research)
    Udo Schüklenk
    Richard Ashcroft
    Monash Bioethics Review, 2000, 19 (2) : 33 - 44
  • [27] Research ethics and the plight of refugees in detention
    Laurence J. Kirmayer
    Cécile Rousseau
    François Crépeau
    Monash Bioethics Review, 2004, 23 (4) : S85 - S92
  • [28] Mental health research, ethics and multiculturalism
    Marioǹ J. Bailes
    I. Harry Minas
    Steven Klimidis
    Monash Bioethics Review, 2006, 25 (1) : S53 - S63
  • [29] Ethical AI governance: mapping a research ecosystem
    Simon Knight
    Antonette Shibani
    Nicole Vincent
    AI and Ethics, 2025, 5 (2): : 841 - 862
  • [30] The ethics of health research and indigenous peoples.
    Jane McKendrick
    Pamela Aratukutuku Bennett
    Monash Bioethics Review, 2003, 22 (4) : 20 - 25