Balancing animal welfare and assisted reproduction: ethics of preclinical animal research for testing new reproductive technologies

被引:0
作者
Verna Jans
Wybo Dondorp
Ellen Goossens
Heidi Mertes
Guido Pennings
Guido de Wert
机构
[1] Maastricht University,Department of Health, Ethics and Society and Research School GROW for Oncology & Developmental Biology
[2] Vrije Universiteit Brussel,Department of Biology of the Testis (BITE)
[3] Ghent University,Bioethics Institute Ghent (BIG), Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences
来源
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy | 2018年 / 21卷
关键词
Ethics; Assisted reproductive technologies; Responsible innovation; Animal research; The three Rs;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In the field of medically assisted reproduction (MAR), there is a growing emphasis on the importance of introducing new assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) only after thorough preclinical safety research, including the use of animal models. At the same time, there is international support for the three R’s (replace, reduce, refine), and the European Union even aims at the full replacement of animals for research. The apparent tension between these two trends underlines the urgency of an explicit justification of the use of animals for the development and preclinical testing of new ARTs. Considering that the use of animals remains necessary for specific forms of ART research and taking account of different views on the moral importance of helping people to have a genetically related child, we argue that, in principle, the importance of safety research as part of responsible innovation outweighs the limited infringement of animal wellbeing involved in ART research.
引用
收藏
页码:537 / 545
页数:8
相关论文
共 139 条
[1]  
Abdullahi A(2014)Animal models in burn research Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 71 3241-3255
[2]  
Amini-Nik S(2005)Challenges of primate embryonic stem cell research Cloning and Stem Cells 7 82-94
[3]  
Jeschke MG(2005)Anonymous or identity-registered sperm donors? A study of Dutch recipients’ choices Human Reproduction 20 820-824
[4]  
Bavister Barry D(2013)How should we assess the safety of IVF technologies? Reproductive Biomedicine Online 27 710-721
[5]  
Don P(2010)Use of cryo-banked oocytes in an ovum donation programme: a prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical trial Human Reproduction 25 2239-2246
[6]  
Wolf A(2002)Epigenetic risks related to assisted reproductive technologies: Risk analysis and epigenetic inheritance Human Reproduction 17 2487-2494
[7]  
Carol Anne(2015)Alternatives to animal testing: A review Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal 23 223-229
[8]  
Brenner JK(2011)Innovative reproductive technologies: Risks and responsibilities Human Reproduction 26 1604-1608
[9]  
Brewaeys LA(2010)Effect of in vitro culture of human embryos on birthweight of newborns Human Reproduction 25 605-612
[10]  
De Bruyn FM(2004)Parenting infants conceived by gamete donation Journal of Family Psychology 18 443-1924