Fuzzy cognitive mapping in participatory research and decision making: a practice review

被引:8
|
作者
Sarmiento, Ivan [1 ,2 ]
Cockcroft, Anne [1 ]
Dion, Anna [1 ]
Belaid, Loubna [1 ]
Silver, Hilah [1 ]
Pizarro, Katherine [1 ]
Pimentel, Juan [1 ,3 ]
Tratt, Elyse [4 ]
Skerritt, Lashanda [1 ]
Ghadirian, Mona Z. [1 ]
Gagnon-Dufresne, Marie-Catherine [1 ,5 ]
Andersson, Neil [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Family Med, 5858 Ch Cote des Neiges, Montreal, PQ H3S 1Z1, Canada
[2] Univ Rosario, Grp Estudios Sistemas Trad Salud, Bogota, Colombia
[3] Univ La Sabana, Fac Med, Chia, Colombia
[4] Inst Lady Davis Rech Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ Montreal, Ecole Sante publ, Dept Med Sociale & Prevent, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[6] Univ Autonoma Guerrero, Ctr Invest Enfermedades Trop, Acapulco, Mexico
关键词
Fuzzy cognitive mapping; Participatory modelling; Weight of evidence; Stakeholder engagement; Fuzzy logic; Public health; Global health; TRANSITIVE CLOSURE; MAPS; KNOWLEDGE; MEDICINE; SCIENCE; MODELS;
D O I
10.1186/s13690-024-01303-7
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Fuzzy cognitive mapping (FCM) is a graphic technique to describe causal understanding in a wide range of applications. This practice review summarises the experience of a group of participatory research specialists and trainees who used FCM to include stakeholder views in addressing health challenges. From a meeting of the research group, this practice review reports 25 experiences with FCM in nine countries between 2016 and 2023.Results The methods, challenges and adjustments focus on participatory research practice. FCM portrayed multiple sources of knowledge: stakeholder knowledge, systematic reviews of literature, and survey data. Methodological advances included techniques to contrast and combine maps from different sources using Bayesian procedures, protocols to enhance the quality of data collection, and tools to facilitate analysis. Summary graphs communicating FCM findings sacrificed detail but facilitated stakeholder discussion of the most important relationships. We used maps not as predictive models but to surface and share perspectives of how change could happen and to inform dialogue. Analysis included simple manual techniques and sophisticated computer-based solutions. A wide range of experience in initiating, drawing, analysing, and communicating the maps illustrates FCM flexibility for different contexts and skill bases.Conclusions A strong core procedure can contribute to more robust applications of the technique while adapting FCM for different research settings. Decision-making often involves choices between plausible interventions in a context of uncertainty and multiple possible answers to the same question. FCM offers systematic and traceable ways to document, contrast and sometimes to combine perspectives, incorporating stakeholder experience and causal models to inform decision-making. Different depths of FCM analysis open opportunities for applying the technique in skill-limited settings.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Four analysis moments for fuzzy cognitive mapping in participatory research
    Sarmiento, Ivan
    Dion, Anna
    Sajna, Mateja
    Andersson, Neil
    GLOBAL HEALTH ACTION, 2024, 17 (01)
  • [2] Transparency and Reproducibility in Participatory Systems Modelling: the Case of Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping
    Olazabal, Marta
    Neumann, Marc B.
    Foudi, Sebastien
    Chiabai, Aline
    SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 2018, 35 (06) : 791 - 810
  • [3] Investigating flood resilience perceptions and supporting collective decision-making through fuzzy cognitive mapping
    Mehryar, Sara
    Surminski, Swenja
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 837
  • [4] Pyrrhic victory? Towards a decision support system for simulation projects in industrial practice based on Fuzzy cognitive mapping
    Auf der Landwehr, Marvin
    Trott, Maik
    von Billoew, Kira
    von Viebahn, Christoph
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 186
  • [5] Spatially Explicit Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping for Participatory Modeling of Stormwater Management
    White, Corey T.
    Mitasova, Helena
    BenDor, Todd K.
    Foy, Kevin
    Pala, Okan
    Vukomanovic, Jelena
    Meentemeyer, Ross K.
    LAND, 2021, 10 (11)
  • [6] Questioning the practice of participation: Critical reflections on participatory mapping as a research tool
    Laituri, Melinda
    Luizza, Matthew W.
    Hoover, Jamie D.
    Allegretti, Arren Mendezona
    APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2023, 152
  • [7] Decision-making analysis in post-fire and explosion aftermath assessment tool: A fuzzy cognitive mapping approach
    Zakaria, Hasnolizar
    Muhammad, Masdi
    PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 2024, 43 (S1) : S134 - S149
  • [8] Cross-country use of participatory research methods in practice to enhance inclusive decision-making
    Krishnan, Sneha
    Soden, Robert
    Aguihon, Bhen
    Liu, Rongkun
    Khatiwada, Pradip
    DISASTER PREVENTION AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 31 (02) : 115 - 123
  • [9] Intuitionistic Fuzzy Cognitive Maps for Medical Decision Making
    Iakovidis, Dimitris K.
    Papageorgiou, Elpiniki
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN BIOMEDICINE, 2011, 15 (01): : 100 - 107
  • [10] Cognitive Network Access using Fuzzy Decision Making
    Baldo, Nicola
    Zorzi, Michele
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, 2009, 8 (07) : 3523 - 3535