Randomized Study Comparing Two Regimens of Oral Sodium Phosphates Solution Versus Low-Dose Polyethylene Glycol and Bisacodyl

被引:0
作者
Pramod Malik
David H. Balaban
William O. Thompson
Deborah J. B. Galt
机构
[1] Gastroenterology Associates of Tidewater P.C.,Department of Biostatistics
[2] Charlottesville Gastroenterology Associates,undefined
[3] Medical College of Georgia,undefined
[4] C.B. Fleet Company,undefined
[5] Inc.,undefined
来源
Digestive Diseases and Sciences | 2009年 / 54卷
关键词
Bowel preparation; Colonoscopy; Polyethylene glycol; Sodium phosphates;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Low-volume bowel preparation regimens for colonoscopy are reported to improve patient acceptance and compliance. We sought to compare the bowel cleansing efficacy, tolerability, and acceptability of three low-volume regimens: an oral sodium phosphates solution 45/45 ml (NaP-45/45), a reduced-dose oral sodium phosphates solution 45/30 ml (NaP-45/30), and polyethylene glycol plus bisacodyl (PEG-2L). Results A total of 121 patients were evaluated (mean age 55.2 ± 8.9 years). Bowel cleansings rated as excellent and good were significantly different among the groups: NaP-45/45 = 98%, NaP-45/30 = 88%, and PEG-2L = 76% (P < 0.04). Side effects were not significantly different except for greater thirst in the NaP-45/45 group (P = 0.001) and increased vomiting in females using PEG-2L (two-tailed interaction, P < 0.10). Willingness to retake the preparation was higher among the sodium phosphates regimens (88, 95, and 73%, respectively; P = 0.019). Conclusions Better cleansing and willingness to retake the regimen was achieved with the oral sodium phosphates solutions than with polyethylene glycol plus bisacodyl.
引用
收藏
页码:833 / 841
页数:8
相关论文
共 163 条
[1]  
Winawer S(1993)Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup N Engl J Med 329 1977-1981
[2]  
Zauber A(2005)Have we oversold colonoscopy? Gastroenterology 129 1815-2714
[3]  
Ho M(2004)Fecal DNA versus fecal occult blood for colorectal-cancer screening in an average-risk population N Engl J Med 351 2704-114
[4]  
O’Brien M(2003)Fecal occult blood testing in a general medical clinic: comparison between guaiac-based and immunochemical-based tests Am J Med 115 111-1029
[5]  
Gottlieb L(2006)Increased serum levels of complement C3a anaphylatoxin indicate the presence of colorectal tumors Gastroenterology 131 1020-1844
[6]  
Sternberg S(2005)Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy computer-aided polyp detection in a screening population Gastroenterology 129 1832-3194
[7]  
Ransohoff DF(2002)A prospective, controlled assessment of factors influencing acceptance of screening colonoscopy Am J Gastroenterol 97 3186-585
[8]  
Imperiale TF(2003)Patient preferences for CT colonography, conventional colonoscopy, and bowel preparation Am J Gastroenterol 98 578-656
[9]  
Ransohoff DF(2007)Incidence of minor complications and time lost from normal activities after screening or surveillance colonoscopy Gastrointest Endosc 67 648-1700
[10]  
Itzkowitz SH(2002)Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy Am J Gastroenterol 97 1696-427