Teacher design knowledge for technology enhanced learning: an ecological framework for investigating assets and needs

被引:0
作者
Susan McKenney
Yael Kali
Lina Markauskaite
Joke Voogt
机构
[1] Open University of the Netherlands,
[2] University of Twente,undefined
[3] University of Haifa,undefined
[4] The University of Sydney,undefined
[5] University of Amsterdam,undefined
[6] Windesheim University of Applied Sciences,undefined
来源
Instructional Science | 2015年 / 43卷
关键词
Teachers; Designers; Design; Technology-enhanced learning;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Despite the fact that teaching is increasingly referred to as a design science, teacher education programs devote relatively little time to developing expertise in the design of instruction, beyond lesson planning. Yet today’s teachers not only plan lessons that incorporate existing classroom activities and instructional resources, they also design new learning activities and create their own (technology enhanced) learning materials. Different approaches have been tried to support pre- and in-service teacher design learning. Past efforts to develop teacher skills in design had limited success, probably due to poor alignment of traditional instructional design models with teachers’ knowledge, needs and natural ways of engaging with design tasks. More recently, researchers have begun to investigate and develop ways to build on teacher expertise to support them in their design efforts. Yet to date, little has been done to capitalize on what is already understood about teachers as designers nor to draw on the wealth of literature on designers and designing outside the field of education. With the ultimate aim of supporting the work of teachers as designers of technology enhanced learning, this contribution synthesizes research on design from classical design fields, instructional design, and teachers’ designing. These perspectives are brought together in an ecological framework that can be used by researchers to study teacher design knowledge and work across projects. This synthesis could also provide an articulated framework for developers and facilitators of teacher professional development programs for identifying key areas for support to teacher-designers in specific settings.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 202
页数:21
相关论文
共 185 条
[51]  
DiGiano C(2011)Recurrent routines: Analyzing and supporting orchestration in technology-enhanced primary classrooms Computers & Education 57 1214-348
[52]  
Yarnall L(2000)What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher 29 4-33
[53]  
Patton C(2012)What is design thinking and why is it important? Review of Educational Research 82 330-86
[54]  
Roschelle J(2008)Helping education students understand learning through designing Educational Technology 48 26-48
[55]  
Tatar D(1992)What do instructional designers actually do? An initial investigation of expert practice Performance Improvement Quarterly 5 65-205
[56]  
Manley M(2006)Educating for innovation Thinking Skills and Creativity 1 41-334
[57]  
Donald C(1962)The concept of the structure of a discipline Educational Record 43 197-410
[58]  
Blake A(2009)Assimilating online technologies into school culture Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects 5 207-134
[59]  
Girault I(1998)SCADS: A model of children’s strategy choices and strategy discoveries Psychological Science 9 405-496
[60]  
Datt A(1996)Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces Information Systems Research 7 111-221