Methamphetamine-, d-Amphetamine-, and p-Chloroamphetamine-Induced Neurotoxicity Differentially Effect Impulsive Responding on the Stop-Signal Task in Rats

被引:0
作者
Teri M. Furlong
Lee S. Leavitt
Kristen A. Keefe
Jong-Hyun Son
机构
[1] University of Utah,Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology
来源
Neurotoxicity Research | 2016年 / 29卷
关键词
Amphetamine; Stop-signal task; Behavioral inhibition; Impulsive action; Dopamine; Serotonin;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Abused amphetamines, such as d-amphetamine (AMPH) and methamphetamine (METH), are highly addictive and destructive to health and productive lifestyles. The abuse of these drugs is associated with impulsive behavior, which is likely to contribute to addiction. The amphetamines also differentially damage dopamine (DA) and serotonin (5-HT) systems, which regulate impulsive behavior; therefore, exposure to these drugs may differentially alter impulsive behavior to effect the progression of addiction. We examined the impact of neurotoxicity induced by three amphetamines on impulsive action using a stop-signal task in rats. Animals were rewarded with a food pellet after lever pressing (i.e., a go trial), unless an auditory cue was presented and withholding lever press gained reward (i.e., a stop trial). Animals were trained on the task and then exposed to a neurotoxic regimen of either AMPH, p-chloroamphetamine (PCA), or METH. These regimens preferentially reduced DA transporter levels in striatum, 5-HT transporter levels in prefrontal cortex, or both, respectively. Assessment of performance on the stop-signal task beginning 1 week after the treatment revealed that AMPH produced a deficit in go-trial performance, whereas PCA did not alter performance on either trial type. In contrast, METH produced a deficit in stop-trial performance (i.e., impulsive action) but not go-trial performance. These findings suggest that the different neurotoxic consequences of substituted amphetamines are associated with different effects on inhibitory control over behavior. Thus, the course of addiction and maladaptive behavior resulting from exposure to these substances is likely to differ.
引用
收藏
页码:569 / 582
页数:13
相关论文
共 316 条
[41]  
Bowyer JF(2005)Deficits in response inhibition associated with chronic methamphetamine abuse Drug Alcohol Depend 79 273-126
[42]  
Davies DL(2000)Profiles of cognitive dysfunction in chronic amphetamine and heroin abusers Neuropsychopharmacology 23 113-69
[43]  
Schmued L(2003)Sulpiride alleviates the attentional impairments of rats with medial prefrontal cortex lesions Behav Brain Res 138 59-26
[44]  
Broening HW(2008)The role of impulsive behavior in drug abuse Psychopharmacology 200 1-313
[45]  
Newport GD(2009)Remediation of attentional dysfunction in rats with lesions of the medial prefrontal cortex by intra-accumbens administration of the dopamine D(2/3) receptor antagonist sulpiride Psychopharmacology 202 307-769
[46]  
Slikker W(2010)Nondependent stimulant users of cocaine and prescription amphetamines show verbal learning and memory deficits Biol Psychiatry 68 762-380
[47]  
Holson RR(2002)The 5-choice serial reaction time task: behavioural pharmacology and functional neurochemistry Psychopharmacology 163 362-1037
[48]  
Brunswick DJ(2008)Similar effects of the selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor atomoxetine on three distinct forms of impulsivity in the rat Neuropsychopharmacology 33 1028-123
[49]  
Benmansour S(2000)Blockade of muscarinic, rather than nicotinic, receptors impairs attention, but does not interact with serotonin depletion Psychopharmacology 148 111-562
[50]  
Tejani-Butt SM(2009)Extended methamphetamine self-administration in rats results in a selective reduction of dopamine transporter levels in the prefrontal cortex and dorsal striatum not accompanied by marked monoaminergic depletion J Pharmacol Exp Ther 331 555-297