Methamphetamine-, d-Amphetamine-, and p-Chloroamphetamine-Induced Neurotoxicity Differentially Effect Impulsive Responding on the Stop-Signal Task in Rats

被引:0
作者
Teri M. Furlong
Lee S. Leavitt
Kristen A. Keefe
Jong-Hyun Son
机构
[1] University of Utah,Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology
来源
Neurotoxicity Research | 2016年 / 29卷
关键词
Amphetamine; Stop-signal task; Behavioral inhibition; Impulsive action; Dopamine; Serotonin;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Abused amphetamines, such as d-amphetamine (AMPH) and methamphetamine (METH), are highly addictive and destructive to health and productive lifestyles. The abuse of these drugs is associated with impulsive behavior, which is likely to contribute to addiction. The amphetamines also differentially damage dopamine (DA) and serotonin (5-HT) systems, which regulate impulsive behavior; therefore, exposure to these drugs may differentially alter impulsive behavior to effect the progression of addiction. We examined the impact of neurotoxicity induced by three amphetamines on impulsive action using a stop-signal task in rats. Animals were rewarded with a food pellet after lever pressing (i.e., a go trial), unless an auditory cue was presented and withholding lever press gained reward (i.e., a stop trial). Animals were trained on the task and then exposed to a neurotoxic regimen of either AMPH, p-chloroamphetamine (PCA), or METH. These regimens preferentially reduced DA transporter levels in striatum, 5-HT transporter levels in prefrontal cortex, or both, respectively. Assessment of performance on the stop-signal task beginning 1 week after the treatment revealed that AMPH produced a deficit in go-trial performance, whereas PCA did not alter performance on either trial type. In contrast, METH produced a deficit in stop-trial performance (i.e., impulsive action) but not go-trial performance. These findings suggest that the different neurotoxic consequences of substituted amphetamines are associated with different effects on inhibitory control over behavior. Thus, the course of addiction and maladaptive behavior resulting from exposure to these substances is likely to differ.
引用
收藏
页码:569 / 582
页数:13
相关论文
共 316 条
[11]  
Elands SA(1992)Effects of high-dose methamphetamine on monoamine uptake sites in rat brain measured by quantitative autoradiography Synapse 11 287-293
[12]  
Oganya KC(2005)Stop signal response inhibition is not modulated by tryptophan depletion or the serotonin transporter polymorphism in healthy volunteers: implications for the 5-HT theory of impulsivity Psychopharmacology 182 570-578
[13]  
Eagle DM(2012)Dopamine, serotonin and impulsivity Neuroscience 215 42-58
[14]  
Robbins TW(2007)Nucleus accumbens D2/3 receptors predict trait impulsivity and cocaine reinforcement Science 315 1267-1270
[15]  
Baxter MG(2011)Impulsivity, compulsivity, and top-down cognitive control Neuron 69 680-694
[16]  
Murray EA(2013)An evaluation of the evidence that methamphetamine abuse causes cognitive decline in humans Neuropsychopharmacology 38 259-274
[17]  
Belcher AM(2008)Impulsive choice and impulsive action predict vulnerability to distinct stages of nicotine seeking in rats Biol Psychiatry 63 301-308
[18]  
O’Dell SJ(2009)The war on drugs: methamphetamine, public health, and crime Am Econ Rev 99 324-349
[19]  
Marshall JF(2010)Is there an inhibitory-response-control system in the rat? Evidence from anatomical and pharmacological studies of behavioral inhibition Neurosci Biobehav Rev 34 50-72
[20]  
Belcher AM(2003)Inhibitory control in rats performing a stop-signal reaction-time task: effects of lesions of the medial striatum and d-amphetamine Behav Neurosci 117 1302-1317