Variation of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation in serial samples in glioblastoma

被引:0
|
作者
Jonathon F. Parkinson
Helen R. Wheeler
Adele Clarkson
Catriona A. McKenzie
Michael T. Biggs
Nicholas S. Little
Raymond J. Cook
Marinella Messina
Bruce G. Robinson
Kerrie L. McDonald
机构
[1] University of Sydney,Cancer Genetics Group, Kolling Institute of Medical Research
[2] Royal North Shore Hospital,Department of Neurosurgery
[3] Royal North Shore Hospital,Department of Medical Oncology
[4] Royal North Shore Hospital,Department of Anatomical Pathology, Pacific Laboratory Medicine Services
来源
Journal of Neuro-Oncology | 2008年 / 87卷
关键词
Glioma; MGMT; Temozolomide; Methylation; DNA repair;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Methylation of the promoter region of the O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene is known to be predictive of response to temozolomide treatment in patients with glioblastoma. Contrastingly, little is known about variation in the methylation status of the MGMT promoter after treatment or across different regions of the same tumor. About 22 samples from 10 patients who had undergone multiple resections of a glioblastoma were examined with promoter sequencing. Of these, 20 were also analyzed using Methylation Specific PCR (MSP). The methylation status of the MGMT promoter was altered in the specimens obtained pre and post treatment in 2 of 9 samples as assessed by MSP and 7 out of 10 patients as assessed by promoter sequencing. In four patients, the MGMT promoter was unmethylated at primary surgery, but displayed some methylation (32, 44, 12, and 4%) on post-treatment sampling. Alteration in MSP status from unmethylated to methylated was also observed in 2 of these 4 patients. In another patient, methylation increased from 40% on initial sampling to 68% on the second sample. The remaining two patients initially demonstrated some degree of methylation (72% and 12%); subsequent sampling showed no methylation of the MGMT promoter. To ensure variable methylation status was not due to intra-tumoral variability, three to four specimens were sampled from different regions of large glioblastomas (n = 7). Promoter sequencing revealed minimal variation in methylation in all but two sites examined. Immunohistochemistry also demonstrated minimal change in MGMT expression across the tumors. This suggests that variation in MGMT promoter methylation can occur within the same tumor after treatment, necessitating caution in clinical decision-making based on this analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 78
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Combined analysis of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase protein expression and promoter methylation provides optimized prognostication of glioblastoma outcome
    Lalezari, Shadi
    Chou, Arthur P.
    Tran, Anh
    Solis, Orestes E.
    Khanlou, Negar
    Chen, Weidong
    Li, Sichen
    Carrillo, Jose A.
    Chowdhury, Reshmi
    Selfridge, Julia
    Sanchez, Desiree E.
    Wilson, Ryan W.
    Zurayk, Mira
    Lalezari, Jonathan
    Lou, Jerry J.
    Ormiston, Laurel
    Ancheta, Karen
    Hanna, Robert
    Miller, Paul
    Piccioni, David
    Ellingson, Benjamin M.
    Buchanan, Colin
    Mischel, Paul S.
    Nghiemphu, Phioanh L.
    Green, Richard
    Wang, He-Jing
    Pope, Whitney B.
    Liau, Linda M.
    Elashoff, Robert M.
    Cloughesy, Timothy F.
    Yong, William H.
    Lai, Albert
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2013, 15 (03) : 370 - 381
  • [42] O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation and isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation as prognostic factors in a cohort of Saudi patients with glioblastoma
    Alassiri, Ali H.
    Alkhaibary, Ali
    Al-Sarheed, Saud
    Alsufani, Fahd
    Alharbi, Mohammed
    Alkhani, Ahmed
    Aloraidi, Ahmed
    ANNALS OF SAUDI MEDICINE, 2019, 39 (06) : 410 - 416
  • [43] The Clinical Significance of O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase Promoter Methylation Status in Adult Patients With Glioblastoma: A Meta-analysis
    Zhao, Yu-Hang
    Wang, Ze-Fen
    Cao, Chang-Jun
    Weng, Hong
    Xu, Cheng-Shi
    Li, Kai
    Li, Jie-Li
    Lan, Jing
    Zeng, Xian-Tao
    Li, Zhi-Qiang
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [44] Selection of chemotherapy for glioblastoma expressing O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase
    Iwadate, Yasuo
    Matsutani, Tomoo
    Hasegawa, Yuzo
    Shinozaki, Natsuki
    Oide, Takashi
    Tanizawa, Toru
    Nakatani, Yukio
    Saeki, Naokatsu
    Fujimoto, Shuichi
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2010, 1 (01) : 53 - 57
  • [45] Inactivation of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) by promoter hypermethylation is associated with loss of MGMT protein expression in skin cancer
    Abdel-Farrah, R
    Glick, A
    Hennings, H
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 2001, 117 (02) : 473 - 473
  • [46] O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter hypermethylation in colorectal carcinogenesis
    Menigatti, Mirco
    Pedroni, Monica
    Verrone, Anna Maria
    Borghi, Francesca
    Scarselli, Alessandra
    Benatti, Piero
    Losi, Lorena
    Di Gregorio, Carmela
    Schar, Primo
    Marra, Giancarlo
    De Leon, Maurizio Ponz
    Roncucci, Luca
    ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2007, 17 (06) : 1421 - 1427
  • [47] Promoter hypermethylation of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase gene in gliomas
    Ohgaki, H
    Nakamura, M
    Watanabe, T
    Kleihues, P
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPATHOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY, 2001, 60 (05): : 534 - 534
  • [48] O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT): Can function explain a suicidal mechanism?
    Gouws, Chrisna
    Pretorius, Pieter J.
    MEDICAL HYPOTHESES, 2011, 77 (05) : 857 - 860
  • [49] O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase (MGMT): Challenges and New Opportunities in Glioma Chemotherapy
    Yu, Wei
    Zhang, Lili
    Wei, Qichun
    Shao, Anwen
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 9
  • [50] Post-transcriptional regulation of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase MGMT in glioblastomas
    Ramakrishnan, Valya
    Kushwaha, Deepa
    Koay, Debbie C.
    Reddy, Hasini
    Mao, Ying
    Zhou, Liangfu
    Ng, Kimberly
    Zinn, Pascal
    Carter, Bob
    Chen, Clark C.
    CANCER BIOMARKERS, 2011, 10 (3-4) : 185 - 193