Models of occupational medicine practice: an approach to understanding moral conflict in "dual obligation" doctors

被引:11
作者
Tamin, Jacques [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Sch Law, Ctr Social Eth & Policy, Manchester, Lancs, England
关键词
Occupational medicine models; Occupational physician; Doctor-patient relationship; Dual obligation; Moral conflict; Fiduciary obligations;
D O I
10.1007/s11019-012-9426-4
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
In the United Kingdom (UK), ethical guidance for doctors assumes a therapeutic setting and a normal doctor-patient relationship. However, doctors with dual obligations may not always operate on the basis of these assumptions in all aspects of their role. In this paper, the situation of UK occupational physicians is described, and a set of models to characterise their different practices is proposed. The interaction between doctor and worker in each of these models is compared with the normal doctor-patient relationship, focusing on the different levels of trust required, the possible power imbalance and the fiduciary obligations that apply. This approach highlights discrepancies between what the UK General Medical Council guidance requires and what is required of a doctor in certain roles or functions. It is suggested that using this modelling approach could also help in clarifying the sources of moral conflict for other doctors with "dual obligations" in their various roles.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 506
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, A question of trust: the 2002 Reith lectures
[2]  
[Anonymous], GOOD MED PRACT
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, CONF
[4]  
[Anonymous], EUR DEF GEN PRACT FA
[5]  
Ballard J., 2011, OCCUPATIONAL HLTH AT, V8, P21
[6]  
Bartlett Peter, 1997, Med Law Rev, V5, P193
[7]  
Brazier M, 1999, ISSU BIOMED ETHICS, P179
[8]  
British Medical Association, 2012, MED ETH TOD BMAS HDB, VThird Edition
[9]  
Brody H., 1992, HEALERS POWER
[10]  
Centre for Workforce Intelligence, 2011, MED SPEC WORKF FACTS