Incorporation of TILs in daily breast cancer care: how much evidence can we bear?

被引:0
作者
Anne-Vibeke Laenkholm
Grace Callagy
Marcelo Balancin
John M. S. Bartlett
Christos Sotiriou
Caterina Marchio
Marleen Kok
Carlos Henrique Dos Anjos
Roberto Salgado
机构
[1] Zealand University Hospital,Department of Surgical Pathology
[2] NUI Galway,Discipline of Pathology
[3] Lambe Institute for Translational Research,Department of Pathology
[4] University of São Paulo Medical School (USP),Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer
[5] The University of Edinburgh,Medical Oncology Department, Institut Jules Bordet
[6] Université Libre de Bruxelles,Division of Pathology
[7] Candiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCS,Department of Medical Sciences
[8] University of Turin,Departments of Medical Oncology and Tumor Biology and Immunology
[9] The Netherlands Cancer Institute,Oncology Service, Department of Medicine
[10] Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center,Department of Pathology
[11] GZA-ZNA Hospitals,Division of Research
[12] Peter Mac Callum Centre,undefined
来源
Virchows Archiv | 2022年 / 480卷
关键词
TILs; Breast cancer; Prognosis; Immunotherapy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
One of the most important developments in the breast cancer field has been an improved understanding of prognostic and predictive biomarkers, of which TILs are increasingly gaining importance. The evaluation of TILs by light microscopy on a H&E-stained section is workable in a daily practice setting. Reproducibility of reporting TILs is good, but heterogeneity is a cause of variation. TILs provide clinicians with important prognostic information for patients with TNBC, as early-stage TNBC with high TILs have > 98% 5-year survival and TILs predict benefit to immunotherapy. Importantly, while TILs do not have level of evidence IA, TILs should be used as a prognostic factor with caution and with other accepted prognostic variables, such as tumour size and lymph node status, to inform clinicians and patients on their treatment options. A framework on how to use the TILs in daily practice is proposed, including a co-assessment with PD-L1 for its predictive role to immunotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 162
页数:15
相关论文
共 56 条
[31]  
Winer EP(2020)“Interchangeability” of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assays: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy Mod Pathol 33 4-59
[32]  
Cortes J(2020)How current assay approval policies are leading to unintended imprecision medicine Lancet Oncol 21 1399-1281
[33]  
El Bairi K(2020)Atezolizumab in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: IMpassion130 and 131 trials - how to explain different results? ESMO Open 5 e001112-577
[34]  
Gonzalez-Ericsson PI(2020)Atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel as first-line treatment for unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (IMpassion130): updated efficacy results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial Lancet Oncol 21 44-9
[35]  
Buttner R(2021)PD-L1 expression in metaplastic breast carcinoma using the PD-L1 SP142 assay and concordance among PD-L1 immunohistochemical assays Am J Surg Pathol 45 1274-1164
[36]  
Rimm DL(2021)A multicentre analytical comparison study of inter-reader and inter-assay agreement of four programmed death-ligand 1 immunohistochemistry assays for scoring in triple-negative breast cancer Histopathology 78 567-871
[37]  
Reisenbichler ES(2018)Reproducibility and predictive value of scoring stromal tumour infiltrating lymphocytes in triple-negative breast cancer: a multi-institutional study Breast Cancer Res Treat 171 1-94
[38]  
Torlakovic E(2016)Standardized evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in breast cancer: results of the ring studies of the international immuno-oncology biomarker working group Mod Pathol 29 1155-2248
[39]  
Salgado R(2019)Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in NRG oncology/NSABP B-31 adjuvant trial for early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer J Natl Cancer Inst 111 867-157
[40]  
Franzoi MA(2018)Standardized assessment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in breast cancer: an evaluation of inter-observer agreement between pathologists Acta Oncol 57 90-777