Porter Hypothesis vs Pollution Haven Hypothesis: Can There Be Environmental Policies Getting Two Eggs in One Basket?

被引:0
作者
Claudia Ranocchia
Luca Lambertini
机构
[1] University of Bologna,Department of Economics
来源
Environmental and Resource Economics | 2021年 / 78卷
关键词
Implicit collusion; Win–win solution; Relocation; Green technology; Emission taxation; Environmental standard; L13; L51; Q50;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Porter hypothesis and the pollution haven hypothesis seem to predict opposite reactions by firms facing environmental regulation, as the first invokes the arising of a win–win solution while the second envisages the possibility for firms to flee abroad. We illustrate the possibility of designing policies (taking the form of either emission taxation or environmental standards) able to eliminate firms’ incentives to relocate their plants abroad and create a parallel incentive for them to deliver a win–win solution by investing either in replacement technologies under emission taxation, or in abatement technologies under an environmental standard. This is worked out in a Cournot supergame in which firms may activate the highest level of collusion compatible with their intertemporal preferences.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 199
页数:22
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
Abreu DJ(1986)Extremal equilibria of oligopolistic supergames J Econ Theory 39 191-225
[2]  
Ambec S(2013)The Porter hypothesis at 20: can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Rev Environ Econ Policy 7 2-22
[3]  
Cohen M(2009)Strategic quality competition and the Porter hypothesis J Environ Econ Manag 57 182-94
[4]  
Elgie S(1980)The Pigouvian tax rule under monopoly Am Econ Rev 70 1037-41
[5]  
Lanoie P(1994)Strategic environmental policy and international trade J Public Econ 54 325-38
[6]  
André FJ(1969)External diseconomies, corrective taxes, and market structure Am Econ Rev 59 174-77
[7]  
González P(2000)R&D cooperation and product market competition Int J Ind Organ 18 1033-47
[8]  
Porteiro N(2017)Foreign direct investment and the environment Annu Rev Environ Resour 42 465-87
[9]  
Barnett A(2011)Market inertia and the introduction of green products: can strategic effects justify the Porter hypothesis? Environ Resour Econ 50 267-84
[10]  
Barrett S(1994)North–South trade and the environment Q J Econ 109 755-87