Remote Monitoring of Cardiovascular Implantable Devices in the Pediatric Population Improves Detection of Adverse Events

被引:0
作者
Lindsey E. Malloy
Jean Gingerich
Mark D. Olson
Dianne L. Atkins
机构
[1] University of Iowa Children’s Hospital,Department of Pediatrics
[2] Carver College of Medicine,Division of Pediatric Cardiology
[3] University of Iowa,undefined
[4] University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics,undefined
来源
Pediatric Cardiology | 2014年 / 35卷
关键词
Remote monitoring; Pediatrics; Implantable cardiac devices; Home monitoring; Telemedicine; Remote follow-up;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
With the exponential growth of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) in pediatric patients, a new method of long-term surveillance, remote monitoring (RM), has become the standard of care. The purpose of this study was to determine the usefulness of RM as a monitoring tool in the pediatric population. A retrospective review was performed of 198 patients at the University of Iowa Children’s Hospital who had CIEDs. Data transmitted by RM were analyzed. The following data were examined: patient demographics; median interval between transmissions; detection of adverse events requiring corrective measures, including detection of lead failure; detection of arrhythmias and device malfunctions independent of symptoms; time gained in the detection of events using RM versus standard practice; the validity of RM; and the impact of RM on data management. Of 198 patients, 162 submitted 615 RM transmissions. The median time between remote transmissions was 91 days. Of 615 total transmissions, 16 % had true adverse events with 11 % prompting clinical intervention. Of those events requiring clinical response, 61 % of patients reported symptoms. The median interval between last follow-up and occurrence of events detected by RM was 46 days, representing a gain of 134 days for patients followed-up at 6-month intervals and 44 days for patients followed-up at 3 month-intervals. The sensitivity and specificity of RM were found to be 99 and 72 %, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were found to be 41 and 99 %, respectively. RM allows for early identification of arrhythmias and device malfunctions, thus prompting earlier corrective measures and improving care and safety in pediatric patients.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 306
页数:5
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Chen J(2008)Design of the Pacemaker REmote Follow-up Evaluation and Review (PREFER) trial to assess the clinical value of the remote pacemaker interrogation in the management of pacemaker patients Trials 9 18-896
  • [2] Wilkoff BL(2007)Early failure of a small-diameter high-voltage implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead Heart Rhythm 4 892-1491
  • [3] Choucair W(2009)Remote monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: new questions raised Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 32 1489-S12
  • [4] Cohen TJ(2007)Remote, wireless, ambulatory monitoring of implantable pacemakers, cardioverter defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy systems: analysis of a worldwide database Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 30 S2-1111
  • [5] Crossley GH(2012)A randomized trial of long-term remote monitoring of pacemaker recipients (the COMPAS trial) Eur Heart J 33 1105-90
  • [6] Johnson WB(2011)Remote patient management using implantable devices J Interv Card Electrophysiol 31 81-1151
  • [7] Hauser RG(2008)Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: a safe, time-saving, and cost-effective means for follow-up Europace 10 1145-601
  • [8] Kallinen LM(2009)Remote monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: prerequisite or luxury? Swiss Med Wkly 139 596-925
  • [9] Almquist AK(2008)HRS/EHRA expert consensus on the monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs): description of techniques, indications, personnel, frequency and ethical considerations Heart Rhythm 5 907-undefined
  • [10] Gornick CC(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined