Diversification by the audit offices in the US and its impact on audit quality

被引：7
作者：
Asthana S. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Department of Accounting, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, 78249, TX
来源：
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting | 2017年 / 48卷 / 4期
关键词：
Audit firm; Audit office; Audit quality; Diversification;
D O I：
10.1007/s11156-016-0576-y
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Audit offices in the US exhibit a wide variation in the number of industries they service. Strategic management theory suggests that diversification can affect the quality of output, depending on the nature and circumstances of diversification. This paper examines the effect of diversification at the audit office level on audit quality. Five proxies of audit quality are examined, mainly, absolute discretionary accruals, propensity to meet-or-beat earnings expectations by a cent, propensity to restate financial statements, propensity to receive a comment letter after an SEC review and propensity to issue a going concern opinion. Results suggest that diversification has detrimental effects on audit quality. On the other hand, when the diversification is part of the audit firm level strategy, the detrimental effects on audit quality are dampened. Moreover, when the diversification at the office level is part of a revenue expansion strategy, the audit quality is adversely affected. However, there is no detrimental effect on the audit quality when revenue expansion is not the objective. Also, diversification across dissimilar industries leads to more adverse effect on audit quality than diversification to similar industries. Results also suggest that when the audit office is located in a market with more (less) diversified client base, the adverse effects of diversification on audit quality are weaker (stronger). Finally, the offices of big-4 audit firms handle diversification better with less adverse effect on audit quality. The findings are important since they identify additional factors that explain audit quality at the audit office level. © 2016, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
引用
收藏
页码：1003 / 1030
页数：27
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]  
Andrews K., The concept of corporate strategy, (1980)
[2]  
Antle R., Gordon E., Narayanamoorthy G., Zhou L., The joint determination of audit fees, non-audit fees, and abnormal accruals, Rev Quant Financ Acc, 27, pp. 235-266, (2006)
[3]  
Arnould R.J., Conglomerate growth and public policy. Economics of conglomerate growth, Oregon State University Department of Agricultural Economics, pp. 72-80, (1969)
[4]  
Arrunada B., The provision of non-audit services by auditors: let the market evolve and decide, Int Rev Law Econ, 19, 4, pp. 513-531, (1999)
[5]  
Ashbaugh H., LaFond R., Mayhew B., Do nonaudit services compromise auditor independence? Further evidence, Acc Rev, 78, 3, pp. 611-639, (2003)
[6]  
Asthana S., Boone J., Abnormal audit fee and audit quality, Audit: J Pract Theory, 31, 3, pp. 1-22, (2012)
[7]  
Balsam S., Krishnan J., Yang J., Auditor industry specialization and earnings quality, Audit: J Pract Theory, 22, 2, pp. 71-97, (2003)
[8]  
Barney J.B., Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, J Manag, 17, pp. 99-120, (1991)
[9]  
Berg G., Ofek E., Diversification effects on firm value, J Financ Econ, 37, pp. 39-65, (1995)
[10]  
Boone C., Brocheler V., Carroll G., Custom service: application and test of resources-partitioning theory among Dutch auditing firms from 1896 to 1992, Org Stud, 21, 2, pp. 355-381, (2000)
12345678