Relative Performance of Limestone, Marble, and Basalt Powders in Replacement of a Recycled Fine Aggregate from Red Mud and Metakaolin-Based Geopolymer Mortar

被引:0
作者
Ouiame Chakkor
Mehmet Fatih Altan
Orhan Canpolat
Hasan Dilbas
Mucteba Uysal
机构
[1] Istanbul Aydin University,Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering
[2] Yildiz Technical University,Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering
[3] Van Yuzuncu Yil University,Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering
来源
Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering | 2022年 / 46卷
关键词
Geopolymer; Recycled aggregate; GGBS; Red mud; Metakaolin; TOPSIS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The current investigation was conducted to reduce the environmental impact of wastes comprising a green, sustainable recycled geopolymer composition (RGC) including granulated-ground-blast-furnace slag (GGBS), metakaolin (MK), red mud (RM) and recycled fine aggregate (RFA). In addition, leftover industrial materials, such as limestone (LS), marble (MR), and basalt (BS) powders, are employed as fillers to replace RFA in various proportions (25, 50, and 75%). Thus, a green RGC consists of wastes. Here, sodium silicate and sodium hydroxide are preferred to prepare a 12 M alkali solution for RGC. Then, physical ultrasound pulse velocity and mechanical compressive and bending strengths are applied to RGC, and the results are evaluated. In addition, to find the best solution for the RGC mixtures, TOPSIS is employed, and the best RGCs are determined for each group, with respect to their physical and mechanical properties. Also, the durability tests are conducted on RGCs determined by TOPSIS. It is found that the best RGC mixture includes 25% RFA with 75% BS.
引用
收藏
页码:2961 / 2974
页数:13
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]  
Aygörmez Y(2021)Evaluation of the red mud and quartz sand on reinforced metazeolite-based geopolymer composites J Build Eng undefined undefined-undefined
[2]  
Bature AS(2021)Influence of alkali activator type and proportion on strength performance of calcined clay geopolymer mortar Constr Build Mater undefined undefined-undefined
[3]  
Khorami M(2020)Influence of activator solution on microstructural and mechanical properties of geopolymer concrete Materialia undefined undefined-undefined
[4]  
Ganjian E(2017)Comparison of the microstructure and the compressive strength of two geopolymers derived from Metakaolin and an industrial sludge Constr Build Mater undefined undefined-undefined
[5]  
Tyrer M(2021)Durability properties of treated recycled aggregate concrete: effect of optimized ball mill method Constr Build Mater undefined undefined-undefined
[6]  
Bellum RR(2010)Abrasion resistance of concrete made with recycled aggregates Int J Sustain Eng undefined undefined-undefined
[7]  
Muniraj K(2013)Recycled aggregate in concrete use of industrial, construction and demolition waste Springer undefined undefined-undefined
[8]  
Madduru SRC(2018)Estimation of geopolymer concrete strength from ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) using high power pulser J Build Eng undefined undefined-undefined
[9]  
Belmokhtar N(2018)Compressive strength and microstructure of assorted wastes incorporated geopolymer mortars: effect of solution molarity Alexandria Eng J undefined undefined-undefined
[10]  
Ammari M(2021)Effect of source materials, additives on the mechanical properties and durability of fly ash and fly ash-slag geopolymer mortar: a review Constr Build Mater undefined undefined-undefined