A criterion-shift model for enhanced discriminability in perceptual identification: A note on the counter model

被引:0
作者
Eric-Jan M. Wagenmakers
René Zeelenberg
Lael J. Schooler
Jeroen G. W. Raaijmakers
机构
[1] University of Amsterdam,Department of Psychonomics
[2] Pennsylvania State University,undefined
[3] University of Amsterdam,undefined
来源
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review | 2000年 / 7卷
关键词
Word Frequency; Implicit Memory; Repetition Priming; Counter Model; Perceptual Identification;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The original version of the counter model for perceptual identification (Ratcliff & McKoon, 1997) assumed that word frequency and prior study act solely to bias the identification process (i.e., subjects have a tendency to prefer high-frequency and studied low-frequency words, irrespective of the presented word). In a recent study, using a two-alternative forced-choice paradigm, we showed an enhanced discriminability effect for high-frequency and studied low-frequency words (Wagenmakers, Zeelenberg, & Raaijmakers, 2000). These results have led to a fundamental modification of the counter model: Prior study and high frequency not only result in bias, but presumably also result in a higher rate of feature extraction (i.e., better perception). We demonstrate that a criterion-shift model, assuming limited perceptual information extracted from the flash as well as a reduced distance to an identification threshold for high-frequency and studied low-frequency words, can also account for enhanced discriminability.
引用
收藏
页码:718 / 726
页数:8
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Bowers J. S.(1999)Priming is not all bias: Commentary on Ratcliff and McKoon (1997) Psychological Review 106 582-596
[2]  
Broadbent D. E.(1967)Word-frequency effect and response bias Psychological Review 74 1-15
[3]  
De Jong R.(1991)Partial information or facilitation? Different interpretations of results from speed-accuracy decomposition Perception & Psychophysics 50 333-350
[4]  
Estes W. K.(1975)The locus of inferential and perceptual processes in letter identification Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104 122-145
[5]  
Estes W. K.(1987)Discriminability and bias in the word-superiority effect Perception & Psychophysics 42 411-422
[6]  
Brunn J. L.(1989)Semantic and perceptual priming: How similar are the underlying mechanisms? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 15 188-194
[7]  
Farah M.(1991)Integration versus interactive activation: The joint influence of stimulus and context in perception Cognitive Psychology 23 558-614
[8]  
Massaro D. W.(1998)More than meets the eye: Context effects in word identification Memory & Cognition 26 1245-1269
[9]  
Cohen M. M.(1996)Contributions of processing fluency to repetition effects in masked word identification Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 50 9-21
[10]  
Masson M. E. J.(1981)An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings Psychological Review 88 375-407