A comparison of outer electron radiation belt dropouts during solar wind stream interface and magnetic cloud driven storms

被引:0
作者
O Ogunjobi
V Sivakumar
Z Mtumela
机构
[1] North–West University,Center for Space Research, School for Physical and Chemical Sciences
[2] University of KwaZulu-Natal,School of Chemistry and Physics
来源
Journal of Earth System Science | 2017年 / 126卷
关键词
Stream interfaces; magnetic clouds; magnetosphere; Earth’s radiation belts; L-shell;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Energetic electrons are trapped in the Earth’s radiation belts which occupy a toroidal region between 3 and 7 RE\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\hbox {R}_{\mathrm{E}}$$\end{document} above the Earth’s surface. Rapid loss of electrons from the radiation belts is known as dropouts. The source and loss mechanisms regulating the radiation belts population are not yet understood entirely, particularly during geomagnetic storm times. Nevertheless, the dominant loss mechanism may require an event based study to be better observed. Utilizing multiple data sources from the year 1997–2007, this study identifies radiation belt electron dropouts which are ultimately triggered when solar wind stream interfaces (SI) arrived at Earth, or when magnetic clouds (MC) arrived. Using superposed epoch analysis (SEA) technique, a synthesis of multiple observations is performed to reveal loss mechanism which might, perhaps, be a major contributor to radiation belt losses under SI and MC driven storms. Results show an abrupt slower decaying precipitation of electron peak (about 3000 counts/sec) on SI arrival within 5.05 <L\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$< L$$\end{document} < 6.05, which persist till 0.5 day before gradual recovery. This pattern is interpreted as an indication of depleted electrons from bounce lost cone via precipitating mechanism known as relativistic electron microburst. On the other hand, MC shows a pancake precipitating peak extending to lower L (Plasmapause); indicating a combination of electron cyclotron harmonic (ECH) and whistler mode waves as the contributing mechanisms.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 129 条
[1]  
Baker DN(2013)A long-lived relativistic electron storage ring embedded in earth’s outer Van Allen belt Science 340 186-190
[2]  
Kanekal SG(2014)First results from imaging riometer installed at Indian Antarctic Station Maitri J. Earth Syst. Sci. 123 593-602
[3]  
Hoxie VC(1992)High-Z energetic particles at geosynchronous orbit during the great solar proton event series of October 1989 J. Geophys. Res. 97 16,897-16,906
[4]  
Henderson MG(2009)Relativistic-electron dropouts and recovery: A superposed epoch study of the magnetosphere and the solar wind J. Geophys. Res. 114 A02201-3725
[5]  
Li X(1974)Interplanetary stream interfaces J. Geophys. Res. 79 3717-228
[6]  
Spence HE(1996)CRESS observations of particle flux dropouts events Adv. Space Res. 18 217-591
[7]  
Elkington SR(2007)Acceleration of killer electrons Nature 3 590-14,064
[8]  
Friedel RHW(2005)Solar wind spatial scales in and comparisons of hourly Wind and ACE plasma and Magnetic field data J. Geophys. Res. 110 A02209-12,444
[9]  
Goldstein J(1997)The wind magnetic cloud and events of October 18–20, 1995: Interplanetary properties and as triggers for geomagnetic activity J. Geophys. Res. 102 14,049-377
[10]  
Hudson MK(1999)"Pancake" electron distributions in the outer radiation belts J. Geophys. Res. 104 12,431-3350