Screening for childhood adversity: the what and when of identifying individuals at risk for lifespan health disparities

被引:0
作者
Kate Ryan Kuhlman
Theodore F. Robles
Julienne E. Bower
Judith E. Carroll
机构
[1] University of California Irvine,Department of Psychology and Social Behavior, School of Social Ecology
[2] Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior,Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology
[3] University of California Los Angeles,Department of Psychology
[4] University of California Los Angeles,undefined
来源
Journal of Behavioral Medicine | 2018年 / 41卷
关键词
Child adversity; Integrated primary care; Health disparities; Adolescence; Academic problems; Parent substance abuse; Prevention science;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Existing research on childhood adversity and health risk across the lifespan lacks specificity regarding which types of exposures to assess and when. The purpose of this study was to contribute to an empirically-supported framework to guide practitioners interested in identifying youth who may be at greatest risk for a lifelong trajectory of health disparities. We also sought to identify the point in childhood at which screening for adversity exposure would capture the largest group of at risk individuals for triage to prevention and intervention services. Participants (n = 4036) collected as part of the Midlife in the United States study reported their medical status and history including physical (cardiovascular disease, hypertension, obesity, diabetes, cancer) and mental health (depression, substance use problems, sleep problems). Participants indicated whether they were exposed to 7 adversities at any point in childhood and their age of exposure to 19 additional lifetime adversities before the age of 18. Parent drug abuse, dropping out or failing out of school, being fired from a job, and sexual assault during childhood exhibited the largest effect sizes on health in adulthood, which were comparable to the effects of childhood maltreatment. Childhood adversity screening in early adolescence may identify the largest proportion of youth at risk for negative health trajectories. The results of this descriptive analysis provide an empirical framework to guide screening for childhood adversity in pediatric populations. We discuss the implications of these observations in the context of prevention science and practice.
引用
收藏
页码:516 / 527
页数:11
相关论文
共 251 条
[31]  
Buysse DJ(2013)The science of early life toxic stress for pediatric practice and advocacy Pediatrics 131 319-633
[32]  
Reynolds CF(2017)Childhood life events, immune activation and the development of mood and anxiety disorders: The TRAILS study Translational Psychiatry 7 e1112-184
[33]  
Monk TH(2010)Childhood adversities and adult psychopathology in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys The British Journal of Psychiatry 197 378-114
[34]  
Berman SR(2008)Effects of enhanced foster care on the long-term physical and mental health of foster care alumni Archives of General Psychiatry 65 625-218
[35]  
Kupfer DJ(2017)Developmental psychoneuroendocrine and psychoneuroimmune pathways from childhood adversity to disease Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 80 166-5642
[36]  
Charlson M(2015)Differential associations between childhood trauma subtypes and adolescent HPA-axis functioning Psychoneuroendocrinology 54 103-856
[37]  
Szatrowski TP(2017)Adverse childhood experiences, mental health, and excessive alcohol use: Examination of race/ethnicity and sex differences Child Abuse and Neglect 69 40-997
[38]  
Peterson J(2000)Validation of self-reported chronic conditions and health services in a managed care population American Journal of Preventive Medicine 18 215-1940
[39]  
Gold J(2015)Causal effects of the early caregiving environment on development of stress response systems in children Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112 5637-219
[40]  
Chartier MJ(2010)Harsh family climate in early life presages the emergence of a proinflammatory phenotype in adolescence Psychological Science 21 848-17