Screening for childhood adversity: the what and when of identifying individuals at risk for lifespan health disparities

被引:0
作者
Kate Ryan Kuhlman
Theodore F. Robles
Julienne E. Bower
Judith E. Carroll
机构
[1] University of California Irvine,Department of Psychology and Social Behavior, School of Social Ecology
[2] Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior,Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology
[3] University of California Los Angeles,Department of Psychology
[4] University of California Los Angeles,undefined
来源
Journal of Behavioral Medicine | 2018年 / 41卷
关键词
Child adversity; Integrated primary care; Health disparities; Adolescence; Academic problems; Parent substance abuse; Prevention science;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Existing research on childhood adversity and health risk across the lifespan lacks specificity regarding which types of exposures to assess and when. The purpose of this study was to contribute to an empirically-supported framework to guide practitioners interested in identifying youth who may be at greatest risk for a lifelong trajectory of health disparities. We also sought to identify the point in childhood at which screening for adversity exposure would capture the largest group of at risk individuals for triage to prevention and intervention services. Participants (n = 4036) collected as part of the Midlife in the United States study reported their medical status and history including physical (cardiovascular disease, hypertension, obesity, diabetes, cancer) and mental health (depression, substance use problems, sleep problems). Participants indicated whether they were exposed to 7 adversities at any point in childhood and their age of exposure to 19 additional lifetime adversities before the age of 18. Parent drug abuse, dropping out or failing out of school, being fired from a job, and sexual assault during childhood exhibited the largest effect sizes on health in adulthood, which were comparable to the effects of childhood maltreatment. Childhood adversity screening in early adolescence may identify the largest proportion of youth at risk for negative health trajectories. The results of this descriptive analysis provide an empirical framework to guide screening for childhood adversity in pediatric populations. We discuss the implications of these observations in the context of prevention science and practice.
引用
收藏
页码:516 / 527
页数:11
相关论文
共 251 条
[1]  
Arnett JJ(1999)Adolescent storm and stress, reconsidered American Psychologist 54 317-326
[2]  
Baldwin JR(2018)Childhood victimization and inflammation in young adulthood: A genetically sensitive cohort study Brain, Behavior, and Immunity 67 211-217
[3]  
Arseneault L(2017)Childhood maltreatment and health impact: The examples of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 24 125-139
[4]  
Caspi A(2003)Development and validation of a brief screening version of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire Child Abuse and Neglect 27 169-190
[5]  
Fisher HL(2008)Health care utilization and costs associated with childhood abuse Journal of General Internal Medicine 23 294-299
[6]  
Moffitt TE(1993)Psychopathology and early experience: A reappraisal of retrospective reports Psychological Bulletin 113 82-98
[7]  
Odgers CL(2017)Family-centered prevention ameliorates the association between adverse childhood experiences and prediabetes status in young black adults Preventive Medicine 100 117-122
[8]  
Basu A(1989)The Pittsburgh sleep quality index: A new instrument for psychiatric practice and research Psychiatry Research 28 193-213
[9]  
McLaughlin KA(1994)Validation of a combined comorbidity index Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 47 1245-1251
[10]  
Misra S(2010)Separate and cumulative effects of adverse childhood experiences in predicting adult health and health care utilization Child Abuse and Neglect 34 454-464