Constructing regulation on assisted migration: findings from science and ethics

被引:0
作者
Maksim Lavrik
机构
[1] Research Institute of Environmental Law, School of Law, Wuhan University, Wuhan
来源
SN Social Sciences | / 1卷 / 9期
关键词
Assisted colonization; Assisted migration; Biodiversity law; Climate change adaptation; Managed relocation;
D O I
10.1007/s43545-021-00251-1
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Many scientists and environmentalists suggest using assisted migration (assisted colonization, managed relocation) as one of the responses to environmental degradation. Assisted migration (AM) is a translocation of animals and plants to the areas outside their native ranges suitable for them under the changing conditions. The international bodies, for example, the Secretariat to the Convention on Biological Diversity, recognize AM as a possible conservation tool. Some jurisdictions inserted it within their law and policy documents such as the 2019 Translocation Operational Policy in New South Wales, Australia. As climate changes, a need for AM can proliferate at national and international levels and further development of the regulation would be needed. However, the tool is a controversial one, for example, due to the risks for the translocating organisms and for the recipient communities, e.g., in case of possible invasiveness of the translocating animals and plants or changes in disease dynamics. This article seeks to summarize the law- and policy-relevant findings from science and ethics concerning AM that could help to construct the regulation that maximizes the benefits of using this tool and minimizes its risks. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
Ahteensuu M., Lehvavirta S., Assisted migration, risks and scientific uncertainty, and ethics: a comment on Albrecht et al.’s review paper, J Agric Environ Ethics, 27, 3, pp. 471-477, (2014)
[2]  
Albrecht G.A., Brooke C., Bennett D.H., Garnett S.T., The ethics of assisted colonization in the age of anthropogenic climate change, J Agric Environ Ethics, 26, 4, pp. 827-845, (2013)
[3]  
Aubin I., Garbe C.M., Colombo S., Drever C.R., McKenney D.W., Messier C., Pedlar J., Saner M.A., Venier L., Wellstead A.M., Winder R., Witten E., Ste-Marie C., Why we disagree about assisted migration: ethical implications of a key debate regarding the future of Canada’s forests, For Chron, 87, 6, pp. 755-765, (2011)
[4]  
Barlow C., Lee Barnes: Torreya Guardian, (2016)
[5]  
Bartz R.J., Brett A., Preserving Reef-Building Coral Genetic Resources with Assisted Migration: Balancing Precaution and Risk., 6, pp. 206-232, (2015)
[6]  
Belgasem A.O., Louhaichi M., The vulnerability of native rangeland plant species to global climate change in the West Asia and North African regions, Clim Change, (2013)
[7]  
Bellard C., Cassey P., Blackburn T.M., Alien species as a driver of recent extinctions, Biol Lett, 12, (2016)
[8]  
Bradshaw C.J.A., Leroy B., Bellard C., Roiz D., Albert C., Fournier A., Barbet-Massin M., Salles J.M., Simard F., Courchamp F., Massive yet grossly underestimated global costs of invasive insects, Nat Commun, 7, (2016)
[9]  
Bucharova A., Assisted migration within species range ignores biotic interactions and lacks evidence, Restor Ecol, (2017)
[10]  
Camacho A.E., Assisted migration: redefining nature and natural resources law under climate change, Yale J Regul, 27, 2, pp. 171-256, (2010)