Health expenditure and gross domestic product: causality analysis by income level

被引:0
作者
Rezwanul Hasan Rana
Khorshed Alam
Jeff Gow
机构
[1] University of Southern Queensland,School of Commerce
[2] University of KwaZulu-Natal,School of Accounting, Economics and Finance
[3] University of Southern Queensland,School of Commerce
来源
International Journal of Health Economics and Management | 2020年 / 20卷
关键词
Health expenditure; Gross domestic product; Westerlund cointergration; Causality analysis; Impulse response function; Common correlated effects; C55; I10; I15; O1;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The empirical findings on the relationship between gross domestic product (GDP) and health expenditure are diverse. The influence of income levels on this causal relationship is unclear. This study examines if the direction of causality and income elasticity of health expenditure varies with income level. It uses the 1995–2014 panel data of 161 countries divided into four income groups. Unit root, cointegration and causality tests were employed to examine the relationship between GDP and health expenditure. Impulse-response functions and forecast-error variance decomposition tests were conducted to measure the responsiveness of health expenditure to changes in GDP. Finally, the common correlated effects mean group method was used to examine the income elasticity of health expenditure. Findings show that no long-term cointegration exists, and the growth in health expenditure and GDP across income levels has a different causal relationship when cross-sectional dependence in the panel is accounted for. About 43% of the variation in global health expenditure growth can be explained by economic growth. Income shocks affect health expenditure of high-income countries more than lower-income countries. Lastly, the income elasticity of health expenditure is less than one for all income levels. Therefore, healthcare is a necessity. In comparison with markets, governments have greater obligation to provide essential health care services. Such results have noticeable policy implications, especially for low-income countries where GDP growth does not cause increased health expenditure.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 77
页数:22
相关论文
共 128 条
[1]  
Abrigo MR(2016)Estimation of panel vector autoregression in Stata Stata Journal 16 778-804
[2]  
Love I(2007)Disease and development: The effect of life expectancy on economic growth Journal of Political Economy 115 925-985
[3]  
Acemoglu D(2014)Revisiting the relationship between unemployment rates and shadow economy. A Toda–Yamamoto approach for the case of Romania Procedia Economics and Finance 10 227-236
[4]  
Johnson S(2012)Granger causality between total expenditure on health and GDP in OECD: Evidence from the Toda–Yamamoto approach Economics Letters 116 541-544
[5]  
Adriana D(2009)Foreign aid and economic growth: New evidence from a panel data approach for five South Asian countries Journal of Policy Modeling 31 155-161
[6]  
Amiri A(2016)The dynamic relationship between health expenditure and economic growth: Is the health-led growth hypothesis valid for Turkey? European Journal of Health Economics 18 567-574
[7]  
Ventelou B(2017)Health care expenditure and income: A global perspective Health Economics 26 863-874
[8]  
Asteriou D(2010)Health care expenditure and income in the OECD reconsidered: Evidence from panel data Economic Modelling 27 804-811
[9]  
Atilgan E(2004)The effect of health on economic growth: A production function approach World Development 32 1-13
[10]  
Kilic D(2005)Health care expenditure and GDP: Are they broken stationary? Journal of Health Economics 24 839-854