A Psychometric Investigation of the Perfectionistic Self-Presentation Scale Using Bifactor Modeling: Evidence for the Unidimensional Structure of the Measure

被引:0
作者
Kevin G. Saulnier
Shelby J. Saulnier
Nicholas P. Allan
机构
[1] Ohio University,Department of Psychology
[2] Akron Children’s Hospital,Department of Adolescent Medicine
来源
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment | 2022年 / 44卷
关键词
Perfectionistic self-presentation; Social anxiety; Psychometric evaluation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Perfectionistic self-presentation (PSP) is a transdiagnostic risk factor typically assessed using the Perfectionistic Self-Presentation Scale (PSPS). The PSPS consists of three subscales, Self-Promotion, Nondisplay of Imperfection, and Nondisclosure of Imperfection. Overlap among these factors and inconsistent evidence for discriminant validity suggests a need to psychometrically evaluate the PSPS to determine the dimensionality of this measure. The current study used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) in a sample of community adults (N = 419; M age = 39.9 years; 67.1% female) to examine the factor structure of the PSPS. Model fit was compared for one-factor, three-factor, and bifactor models. The bifactor model, comprising a general PSP factor and orthogonal Self-Promotion, Nondisplay, and Nondisclosure factors had the best overall model fit. The general PSP factor was reliable and well-represented by its indicators. Additionally, the general PSP factor was related to several forms of psychopathology and related constructs (i.e., social anxiety, depression, negative affect, body dissatisfaction), whereas specific PSP factors were not related to outcome variables. Finally, the general PSP factor explained a large amount of the variance in PSPS scores, suggesting the measure is unidimensional. Findings support treating the PSPS total score as a unidimensional measure of PSP in research and intervention efforts.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 150
页数:11
相关论文
共 168 条
  • [11] Bentler PM(2006)Further investigating method effects associated with negatively worded items on self-report surveys Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 13 440-464
  • [12] Boateng GO(2011)Perfectionism as a transdiagnostic process: A clinical review Clinical Psychology Review 31 203-212
  • [13] Neilands TB(2014)The destructiveness of perfectionism revisited: Implications for the assessment of suicide risk and the prevention of suicide Review of General Psychology 18 156-172
  • [14] Frongillo EA(2016)Projecting perfection by hiding effort: Supplementing the perfectionistic self-presentation scale with a brief self-presentation measure Self and Identity 15 245-261
  • [15] Melgar-Quiñonez HR(2000)The Reputation QuotientSM: A multi-stakeholder measure of corporate reputation Journal of Brand Management 7 241-255
  • [16] Young SL(2013)Development and validation of the Eating Pathology Symptoms Inventory (EPSI) Psychological Assessment 25 859-878
  • [17] Bonifay WE(1992)Full-information item bi-factor analysis Psychometrika 57 423-436
  • [18] Reise SP(2019)Are fit indices used to test psychopathology structure biased? A simulation study Journal of Abnormal Psychology 128 740-764
  • [19] Scheines R(2008)The impact of perfectionistic self-presentation on the cognitive, affective, and physiological experience of a clinical interview Interpersonal and Biological Processes 71 93-122
  • [20] Meijer RR(2003)The interpersonal expression of perfection: Perfectionistic self-presentation and psychological distress Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84 1303-1325