The metaphyseal bone defect predicts outcome in reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture sequelae

被引:0
作者
Stefan Greiner
Stephan Uschok
Sebastian Herrmann
Clemens Gwinner
Carsten Perka
Markus Scheibel
机构
[1] Charité University Medicine Berlin,Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery
[2] Sporthopaedicum Regensburg,undefined
[3] Shoulder and Elbow,undefined
来源
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | 2014年 / 134卷
关键词
Proximal humerus; Bone defect; Reversed shoulder arthroplasty; Fracture sequelae;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) represents an established procedure for treatment of fracture sequelae (FS) after proximal humerus fractures. The present work evaluates which factors are of influence for the clinical outcome. Fifty cases (mean age 69, range 44–89) have been evaluated postoperatively clinically [Constant Score (CS)] and radiographically (mean FU 34; range 24–93 months). The type of primary treatment, the amount of a metaphyseal bone defect, the preoperative status of the rotator cuff, the number of previous operative interventions and the type of FS according to Boileau were analysed whether they are of influence for clinical outcome. The mean CS increased significantly from 16.9 ± 6.7 preoperatively to 54.1 ± 15.7 points postoperatively. The CS of primary conservative treatment was significantly higher in comparison to primary operative treatment. Patients with a metaphyseal bone defect of more than 3 cm had significantly lower CS results. Degenerative changes of the teres minor muscle also had a significant negative influence on clinical results. Score results decreased with increasing number of previous operations. There were no significant difference in between patients classified as Boileau type I and II (category 1) compared to types III and IV (category 2). RSA significantly improved the clinical result. A metaphyseal bone defect and preoperative degeneration of the teres minor showed to be negative prognostic factors. Primary operative treatment and the number of previous operations also negatively influenced the clinical result.
引用
收藏
页码:755 / 764
页数:9
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
Wall B(2007)Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a review of results according to etiology J Bone Jt Surg Am 89 1476-1485
[2]  
Nové-Josserand L(2010)Anatomic and reverse shoulder prostheses in fracture sequelae of the humeral head Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 44 417-425
[3]  
O’Connor DP(2012)The treatment of proximal humerus nonunions in older patients with the reverse shoulder arthroplasty Injury 469 2531-2537
[4]  
Kılıç M(2012)The use of the Lima reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of fracture sequelae of the proximal humerus J Orthop Sci 89 292-300
[5]  
Berth A(2011)Is reverse shoulder arthroplasty a reasonable alternative for revision arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 93 S35-S39
[6]  
Blatter G(2012)Clinical results of revision shoulder arthroplasty using the reverse prosthesis J Shoulder Elb Surg 10 299-308
[7]  
Martinez AA(2012)Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for failed shoulder arthroplasty J Shoulder Elb Surg 304 78-83
[8]  
Bejarano C(2007)The use of the reverse shoulder prosthesis for the treatment of failed hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture J Bone Jt Surg Am 8 599-605
[9]  
Carbonel I(2009)Reverse shoulder prosthesis as revision surgery after fractures of the proximal humerus, treated initially by internal fixation or hemiarthroplasty Chir Organi Mov 214 160-164
[10]  
Martinez AA(2001)Shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of the sequelae of fractures of the proximal humerus J Shoulder Elb Surg 106 13-19