Transient performance comparison of grid-forming converters with different FRT control strategies

被引:6
作者
Shen, Chao [1 ]
Gu, Wei [1 ]
Luo, Enbo [2 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Sch Elect Engn, Nanjing 214135, Peoples R China
[2] Yunnan Power Grid, Elect Power Test & Res Inst, Kunming 650032, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
grid-forming converters (GFMs); fault ride through (FRT); transient stability; transient inrush current; transient modeling; INVERTERS; STABILITY;
D O I
10.1007/s11708-022-0856-2
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Grid-forming converters (GFMs) are faced with the threat of transient inrush current and synchronization instability issues when subjected to grid faults. Instead of disconnecting from the grid unintentionally, GFMs are required to have fault ride through (FRT) capability to maintain safe and stable operation in grid-connected mode during grid fault periods. In recent studies, different FRT control strategies with distinguishing features and that are feasible for different operation conditions have been proposed for GFMs. To determine their application scope, an intuitive comparison of the transient performance of different FRT control strategies is presented in this paper. First, three typical FRT control strategies (virtual impedance, current limiters, and mode-switching control) are introduced and transient mathematical models are established. A detailed comparison analysis on transient inrush current and transient synchronization stability is then presented. The results will be useful for guiding the selection and design of FRT control strategies. Finally, simulation results based on PSCAD/EMTDC are considered to verify the correctness of the theoretical analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 250
页数:12
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Grid code-high and extra high voltage
[2]  
Barsali S, 2002, 2002 IEEE POWER ENGINEERING SOCIETY WINTER MEETING, VOLS 1 AND 2, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, P789, DOI 10.1109/PESW.2002.985115
[3]   Comparison of Current-Limiting Strategies During Fault Ride-Through of Inverters to Prevent Latch-Up and Wind-Up [J].
Bottrell, Nathaniel ;
Green, Timothy C. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, 2014, 29 (07) :3786-3797
[4]   Analysis, Design, and Implementation of Virtual Impedance for Power Electronics Interfaced Distributed Generation [J].
He, Jinwei ;
Li, Yun Wei .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS, 2011, 47 (06) :2525-2538
[5]   Transient Stability Analysis and Enhancement of Renewable Energy Conversion System During LVRT [J].
He, Xiuqiang ;
Geng, Hua ;
Li, Ruiqi ;
Pal, Bikash Chandra .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2020, 11 (03) :1612-1623
[6]  
Japanese Grid-Interconnection Code, 2012, DOCUMENT JEAC 9701 2
[7]   Virtual Synchronous Generator Control With Reliable Fault Ride-Through Ability: A Solution Based on Finite-Set Model Predictive Control [J].
Jongudomkarn, Jonggrist ;
Liu, Jia ;
Ise, Toshifumi .
IEEE JOURNAL OF EMERGING AND SELECTED TOPICS IN POWER ELECTRONICS, 2020, 8 (04) :3811-3824
[8]   Virtual-Impedance-Based Fault Current Limiters for Inverter Dominated AC Microgrids [J].
Lu, Xiaonan ;
Wang, Jianhui ;
Guerrero, Josep M. ;
Zhao, Dongbo .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2018, 9 (03) :1599-1612
[9]  
Moon M S, 1999, 30 ANN IEEE POWER EL
[10]   Grid Forming Inverter Modeling, Control, and Applications [J].
Rathnayake, Dayan B. ;
Akrami, Milad ;
Phurailatpam, Chitaranjan ;
Me, Si Phu ;
Hadavi, Sajjad ;
Jayasinghe, Gamini ;
Zabihi, Sasan ;
Bahrani, Behrooz .
IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 :114781-114807