Inscribing ethics and values in designs for learning: a problematic

被引:0
作者
Colin M. Gray
Elizabeth Boling
机构
[1] Purdue University,
[2] Indiana University,undefined
来源
Educational Technology Research and Development | 2016年 / 64卷
关键词
Ethics; Values; Guarantor of design; Design precedent; Critical design;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The exponential growth in technological capability has resulted in increased interest on the short- and long-term effects of designed artifacts, leading to a focus in many design fields on the ethics and values that are inscribed in the designs we create. While ethical awareness is a key concern in many engineering, technology, and design disciplines—even an accreditation requirement in many fields—instructional design and technology (IDT) has not historically focused their view of practice on ethics, instead relying on a more scientistic view of practice which artificially limits the designer’s interaction with the surrounding society through the artifacts and experiences they design. In this paper, we argue for a heightened view of designer responsibility and design process in an ethical framing, drawing on methods and theoretical frameworks of ethical responsibility from the broader design community. We then demonstrate the frequency of ethical concerns that emerge in a content analysis of design cases that document authentic instructional design practice. We conclude with two paths forward to improve instructional design education and research regarding the nature of practice, advocating for increased documentation of design precedent to generatively complicate our notions of the design process, and for the creation and use of critical designs to foreground ethical and value-related concerns in IDT research and practice.
引用
收藏
页码:969 / 1001
页数:32
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
Albrechtslund A(2007)Ethics and technology design Ethics and Information Technology 9 63-72
[2]  
Boling E(2010)The need for design cases: Disseminating design knowledge International Journal of Designs for Learning 1 1-8
[3]  
Borgmann A(2010)Reality and technology Cambridge Journal of Economics 34 27-35
[4]  
Braun V(2006)Using thematic analysis in psychology Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 77-101
[5]  
Clarke V(2009)The critical, relational practice of instructional design in higher education: An emerging model of change agency Educational Technology Research and Development 57 645-663
[6]  
Campbell K(2001)Designerly ways of knowing: Design discipline versus design science Design Issues 17 49-55
[7]  
Schwier RA(1994)Equity, caring, and beyond: Can feminist ethics inform educational technology? Educational Technology 34 34-39
[8]  
Kenny RF(2007)The design enterprise: Rethinking the HCI education paradigm Design Issues 23 30-45
[9]  
Cross N(2001)Rethinking design education for the 21st century: Theoretical, methodological, and ethical discussion Design Issues 17 5-17
[10]  
Damarin SK(2012)Models of design: Envisioning a future design education Visible Language 46 132-153