Assessment practices: Empowering mathematics and science teachers in rural secondary schools to enhance student learning

被引:0
作者
Panizzon D. [1 ]
Pegg J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl. Ctr. of Sci., Info. and Commun. Technol., Math., Educ. for Rural and Reg. Australia (SiMERR), University of New England, Armidale
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Assessment; Pedagogy; Professional development; SOLO model; Teachers' perceptions;
D O I
10.1007/s10763-007-9084-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Aligned with recent changes to syllabuses in Australia is an assessment regime requiring teachers to identify what their students 'know' and 'can do' in terms of the quality of understanding demonstrated. This paper describes the experiences of 25 secondary science and mathematics teachers in rural schools in New South Wales as they explore the changing nature of assessment and its implications on their classroom practice. To help reconceptualise these changes, teachers were introduced to a cognitive structural model as a theoretical framework. Throughout the 2-year study, teachers attended a series of professional development sessions and received ongoing consultative support. Each session was taped and transcribed while interviews were conducted with each teacher at the end of both years. Analysis of these data using a grounded theory approach identified seven major components of teacher practice impacted by the study. The core component was questioning while the six contributing components were teachers' pedagogical practices, attention to cognition, teaching strategies, assessment linked to pedagogy, classroom advantages for students, and classroom advantages for teachers. These findings represent a major shift in teachers' perceptions of assessment from a focus on the accumulation of students' marks to one of diagnosis as a means of directing teaching to enhance students' scientific and mathematical understandings. © 2007 National Science Council.
引用
收藏
页码:417 / 436
页数:19
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Bell B., Cowie B., The characteristics of formative assessment in science education, Sci Educ, 85, pp. 536-553, (2001)
[2]  
Biggs J., Assessing for learning: Some dimensions underlying new approaches to educational assessment, Alberta J Educ Research, 1, pp. 1-17, (1995)
[3]  
Biggs J., Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment, Higher Educ, 32, pp. 347-364, (1996)
[4]  
Biggs J., Collis K., Evaluating the Quality of Learning: The SOLO Taxonomy, (1982)
[5]  
Biggs J., Collis K., Rowe H., Multimodal learning and the quality of intelligent behaviour, Intelligence: Reconceptualisation and Measurement, pp. 56-76, (1991)
[6]  
Black P., Harrison C., Monk M., Osborne J., Formative assessment, Good Practice in Science Teaching: What Research Has to Say, pp. 25-40, (2000)
[7]  
Black P., Wiliam D., Assessment and classroom learning, Assess Educ, 5, pp. 7-74, (1998)
[8]  
Assessment for learning in a standards-referenced framework, Board Bull, 12, pp. 4-5, (2003)
[9]  
Case R., The Mind's Staircase: Exploring the Conceptual Underpinnings of Children's Thought and Knowledge, (1992)
[10]  
Clarke D., Bishop A.J., Clements M.A., Keitel C., Kilpatrick J., Leung F.K.S., International comparative research in mathematics education, Second International Handbook of Mathematics Education, pp. 143-185, (2003)