Posterolateral spinal fusion in a rabbit model using a collagen–mineral composite bone graft substitute

被引:0
作者
William Robert Walsh
F. Vizesi
G. B. Cornwall
D. Bell
R. Oliver
Y. Yu
机构
[1] University of New South Wales,Surgical and Orthopaedic Research Laboratories (SORL), Prince of Wales Hospital
[2] NuVasive,undefined
[3] Inc.,undefined
来源
European Spine Journal | 2009年 / 18卷
关键词
Spinal fusion; Bone graft; Collagen; Hydroxyapatite; Bone marrow aspirate;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Choosing the appropriate graft material to participate in the healing process in posterolateral spinal fusion continues to be a challenge. Combining synthetic graft materials with bone marrow aspirate (BMA) and autograft is a reasonable treatment option for surgeons to potentially reduce or replace the need for autograft. FormaGraft, a bone graft material comprising 12% bovine-derived collagen and 88% ceramic in the form of hydroxyapatite (HAp) and beta tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) was evaluated in three possible treatment modalities for posterior spinal fusion in a standard rabbit model. These three treatment groups were FormaGraft alone, FormaGraft soaked in autogenous BMA, and FormaGraft with BMA and iliac crest autograft. No statistically demonstrable benefits or adverse effects of the addition of BMA were found in the current study based on macroscopic, radiology or mechanical data. This may reflect, in part, the good to excellent results of the collagen HA/TCP composite material alone in a well healing bony bed. Histology did, however, reveal a benefit with the use of BMA. Combining FormaGraft with autograft and BMA achieved results equivalent to autograft alone. The mineral and organic nature of the material provided a material that facilitated fusion between the transverse processes in a standard preclinical posterolateral fusion model.
引用
收藏
页码:1610 / 1620
页数:10
相关论文
共 108 条
  • [1] Becker S(2006)Osteopromotion by a beta-tricalcium phosphate/bone marrow hybrid implant for use in spine surgery Spine 31 11-17
  • [2] Maissen O(1999)The use of coralline hydroxyapatite with bone marrow, autogenous bone graft, or osteoinductive bone protein extract for posterolateral lumbar spine fusion Spine 24 320-327
  • [3] Ponomarev I(1999)Posterolateral lumbar intertransverse process spine arthrodesis with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2/hydroxyapatite-tricalcium phosphate after laminectomy in the nonhuman primate Spine 24 1179-1185
  • [4] Igor P(1999)In vivo evaluation of coralline hydroxyapatite and direct current electrical stimulation in lumbar spinal fusion Spine 24 2127-2133
  • [5] Stoll T(2004)Experimental posterolateral spinal fusion with porous ceramics and mesenchymal stem cells J Bone Joint Surg Br 86 135-142
  • [6] Thierry S(1991)The origin of bone formed in composite grafts of porous calcium phosphate ceramic loaded with marrow cells Clin Orthop Relat Res 27 4-283
  • [7] Rahn B(1996)Porous ceramics as bone graft substitutes in long bone defects: a biomechanical, histological, and radiographic analysis J Orthop Res 14 351-369
  • [8] Wilke I(2002)Comparison of autograft, coralline graft, and xenograft in promoting posterior spinal fusion Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 36 147-154
  • [9] Ingo W(2007)Multilevel anterior cervical fusion using a collagen-hydroxyapatite matrix with iliac crest bone marrow aspirate: an 18-month follow-up study Neurosurgery 61 963-970
  • [10] Boden SD(2002)Hydroxyapatite granule graft combined with recombinant human bone morphogenic protein-2 for solid lumbar fusion J Spinal Disord Tech 15 237-244