Randomized prospective trial of pylorus-preserving vs. classic duodenopancreatectomy (whipple procedure): Initial clinical results

被引:0
作者
Christian A. Seiler
Markus Wagner
Charlotte Sadowski
Christoph Kulli
Markus W. Büchler
机构
[1] University of Bern,Department of Visceral and Transplantation Surgery
来源
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | 2000年 / 4卷
关键词
Randomized trial; classic Whipple; pylorus-preserving Whipple; pancreatic neoplasm; periampullary neoplasm; morbidity and mortality; survival;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
During the past decades, the classic Whipple resection (cWhipple) and the pylorus-preserving Whipple (ppWhipple) operation have been advanced for the resection of cancer of the pancreatic head. However, no definitive answer exists as to whether the more conservative ppWhipple operation indeed equalizes the short- and long-term results of the cWhipple procedure. Therefore we conducted a randomized prospective trial in a nonselected series of consecutive patients. Demographics, diagnostic, intraoperative, and histologic findings (tumor type and tumor stage of these patients) as well as postoperative mortality, morbidity, and follow-up after discharge were analyzed. For statistical evaluation Kruskal-Wallis and chisquare tests were used where appropriate. Survival was analyzed according to Kaplan-Meier curves, and differences were examined using the log-rank test. From June 1996 to April 1999, a total of 114 patients with suspected pancreatic or periampullary tumors were prospectively randomized to undergo either a cWhipple or a ppWhipple (intention to treat) operation. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 77 of these patients were included in the final analysis. Forty had a cWhipple and 37 had a ppWhipple resection. There were no differences with regard to age, sex distribution, ASA classification, histologic classification, UICC stage, length of stay in the intensive care unit, and length of hospital stay. The ppWhipple group had a significantly shorter operative time, reduced blood loss, and fewer blood transfusions. There was no difference in mortality, but the cWhipple group showed a significantly higher total morbidity. The incidence of delayed gastric emptying was identical in both groups. For long-term follow-up, a total of 61 patients with histologically proven pancreatic or periampullary carcinoma were analyzed. There were no differences in tumor recurrence or in long-term survival at a median follow-up of 1.1 years (range 0.1 to 2.9 years). Our initial results demonstrate that the cWhipple and ppWhipple operations are equally radical. However, ppWhipple may be the procedure of choice for the treatment of pancreatic and periampullary cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 452
页数:9
相关论文
共 126 条
[1]  
Warshaw AL(1992)Pancreatic carcinoma N Engl J Med 326 455-465
[2]  
Fernandez-del Castillo C(1997)Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: Pathology, complications, and outcomes Ann Surg 226 248-257
[3]  
Yeo CJ(1998)Onkologische Standardchirurgie des Pankreaskarzinoms Chir Gastroenterol 14 42-48
[4]  
Cameron JL(1991)Surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer. The United States experience Int J Pancreatol 9 153-157
[5]  
Sohn TA(1994)Chirurgische Ergebnisse und Indikation zu adjuvanten Massnahmen beim Pankreascarcinom Chirurg 65 246-252
[6]  
Baer HU(1996)Survival after resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas Br J Surg 83 625-631
[7]  
Wagner M(1912)Das Carcinom der Papilla duodeni und seine radikale Entfernung Beitr Klin Chir 78 439-486
[8]  
Büchler MW(1942)Present-day surgery of the pancreas N Engl J Med 226 515-518
[9]  
Livingston EH(1944)Carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. Successful radical resection Br J Surg 31 368-373
[10]  
Welton ML(1978)Preservation of the pylorus in pancreaticoduodenectomy Surg Gynecol Obstet 146 959-962