Level 2a evidence comparing robotic versus laparoscopic left lateral hepatic sectionectomy: a meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Shahin Hajibandeh
Shahab Hajibandeh
Alexios Dosis
Mohammed Kaif Qayum
Karim Hassan
Ambareen Kausar
Thomas Satyadas
机构
[1] Queen Elizabeth Hospital,Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit
[2] Cwm Taf University Health Board,Department of General Surgery, Royal Glamorgan Hospital
[3] Bradford Royal Infirmary,Department of General Surgery
[4] Royal Blackburn Hospital,Department of Hepato
[5] Manchester Royal Infirmary Hospital,Pancreato
来源
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | 2022年 / 407卷
关键词
Robotic; Laparoscopic; Left lateral sectionectomy; Hepatic resection;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 489
页数:10
相关论文
共 107 条
[1]  
Lee MK(2015)Perceived complexity of various liver resections: results of a survey of experts with development of a complexity score and classification J Am Coll Surg 220 64-69
[2]  
Gao F(2018)Laparoscopic left lateral hepatic sectionectomy was expected to be the standard for the treatment of left hepatic lobe lesions: a meta-analysis Medicine (Baltimore) 97 e9835-4696
[3]  
Strasberg SM(2016)The comparative costs of laparoscopic and open liver resection: a report for the 2 Surg Endosc 30 4691-426
[4]  
Liu Z(2009) international consensus conference on laparoscopic liver resection J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16 422-774
[5]  
Ding H(2010)Laparoscopic liver sectionectomy 2 and 3 (LLS 2 and 3): towards the “gold standard” Surg Clin North Am 90 761-555
[6]  
Xiong X(2014)Robotic liver surgery Ann Surg 259 549-129
[7]  
Huang Y(2009)Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: a matched comparison BMJ 339 b2700-2238
[8]  
Cleary SP(2018)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration Langenbecks Arch Surg 403 119-1045
[9]  
Han HS(2016)Optimal literature search for systematic reviews in surgery BMJ. 12 i4919-126
[10]  
Yamamoto M(2005)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions BMC Med Res Methodol 2005 13-4764