Abdominal gunshot wounds: Multi-detector-row CT findings compared with laparotomy - A prospective study

被引:12
作者
Ernesto Lima Araujo Melo
Marcos Roberto de Menezes
Giovanni Guido Cerri
机构
[1] Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, CEP 05.403-900 Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Av. Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar
[2] CEP 60.160-230 Fortaleza, Ceará, Av. Dom Luis
关键词
Abdominal trauma; Gunshot wound; Laparotomy; Multi-detector row computed tomography;
D O I
10.1007/s10140-011-1004-1
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study was to access the accuracy of multi-detector-row computed tomography (MDCT) in diagnosing injuries in hemodynamically stable abdominal gunshot wound victims (AGWV). Triplecontrast MDCT was performed in hemodynamically stable AGWV during a 20-month prospective diagnostic accuracy study. Thirty-one patients (30 males, 1 female; mean age, 24.3 years) were evaluated by two radiologists for evidence of injury to solid and hollow organs, vascular structures, urinary bladder, diaphragm, fractures, and general findings (free fluid, pneumoperitoneum, and mesentery lesions). All of the patients underwent laparotomy, and prevalence, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated. No statistically significant differences between radiologists were found. All of the solid and hollow organ lesions, vascular lesions, and general findings were detected. One of the four urinary bladder lesions was missed by MDCT, leading in this case to a sensitivity of 75%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100%, negative predictive value of 96.4%, and accuracy of 96.8% (p00.001). One of the eight diaphragm lesions was missed by MDCT, and its sensitivity was 87.5%, specificity was 100%, positive predictive value was 100%, negative predictive value was 95.8%, and accuracy was 96.8% (p<0.001). Fractures were diagnosed in 74.4% of the patients (24 of 31). Fourteen (43.2%) patients demonstrated non-therapeutic laparotomy, in which minor lesions could have been managed conservatively. We concluded that MDCT is an accurate imaging method in evaluating selected AGWV, providing trusted information for emergency room physicians. © Am Soc Emergency Radiol 2011.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 41
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Pryor J.P., Reilly P.M., Dabrowski G.P., Grossman M.D., Schwab C.W., Nonoperative Management of Abdominal Gunshot Wounds, Annals of Emergency Medicine, 43, 3, pp. 344-353, (2004)
[2]  
Moore E.E., Moore J.B., Van Duzer-Moore S., Thompson J.S., Mandatory laparotomy for gunshot wounds penetrating the abdomen, American Journal of Surgery, 140, 6, pp. 847-851, (1980)
[3]  
Maynard Ade L., Oropeza G., Mandatory operation for penetrating wounds of the abdomen, Am J Surg, 115, 3, pp. 307-312, (1968)
[4]  
Shaftan G.W., Indications for operation in abdominal trauma, Am J Surg, 99, pp. 657-664, (1960)
[5]  
Bull Jr. J.C., Mathewson Jr. C., Exploratory laparotomy in patients with penetrating wounds of the abdomen, Am J Surg, 116, 2, pp. 223-228, (1968)
[6]  
Nance F.C., Wennar M.H., Johnson L.W., Ingram Jr. J.C., Cohn Jr. I., Surgical judgment in the management of penetrating wounds of the abdomen: Experience with 2212 patients, Ann Surg, 179, 5, pp. 639-646, (1974)
[7]  
Lowe R.J., Saletta J.D., Read D.R., Should laparotomy be mandatory or selective in gunshot wounds of the abdomen?, Journal of Trauma, 17, 12, pp. 903-907, (1977)
[8]  
Renz B.M., Feliciano D.V., Unnecessary laparotomies for trauma: A prospective study of morbidity, J Trauma, 38, 3, pp. 350-356, (1995)
[9]  
Henderson V.J., Organ Jr. C.H., Smith R.S., Negative trauma celiotomy, American Surgeon, 59, 6, pp. 365-370, (1993)
[10]  
Renz B.M., Feliciano D.V., The length of hospital stay after an unnecessary laparotomy for trauma: A prospective study, Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, 40, 2, pp. 187-190, (1996)