Evaluation of lived experience Peer Support intervention for mental health service consumers in Primary Care (PS-PC): study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial

被引:2
作者
Lawn, Sharon [1 ,6 ]
Shelby-James, Tania [1 ]
Manger, Sam [2 ]
Byrne, Louise [3 ]
Fuss, Belinda [1 ]
Isaac, Vivian [4 ]
Kaambwa, Billingsley [1 ]
Ullah, Shahid [1 ]
Rattray, Megan [1 ]
Gye, Bill [5 ]
Kaine, Christine [6 ]
Phegan, Caroline [1 ]
Harris, Geoff [7 ]
Worley, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Flinders Univ S Australia, Coll Med & Publ Hlth, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
[2] James Cook Univ, James Cook Univ LPO, Lifestyle Med, 150 Angus Smith Dr, Douglas, Qld 4814, Australia
[3] RMIT, Sch Management, GPO Box 2476, Melbourne, Vic 3001, Australia
[4] Charles Sturt Univ, Fac Sci & Hlth, Albury, NSW 2640, Australia
[5] Community Mental Hlth Australia, POB 668, Rozelle, NSW 2039, Australia
[6] Lived Experience Australia, POB 96, Brighton 5048, Australia
[7] Mental Hlth Coalit South Australia, Suite 2-195 North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Mental health; Primary care; Mental health services; Consumers; Peer workers; Lived experience workforce; Cluster-randomised trial; DISCHARGE; RECOVERY;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-024-08165-y
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background The demand for mental health services in Australia is substantial and has grown beyond the capacity of the current workforce. As a result, it is currently difficult for many to access secondary healthcare providers. Within the secondary healthcare sector, however, peer workers who have lived experience of managing mental health conditions have been increasingly employed to intentionally use their journey of recovery in supporting others living with mental health conditions and their communities. Currently, the presence of peer workers in primary care has been limited, despite the potential benefits of providing supports in conjunction with GPs and secondary healthcare providers.Methods This stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) aims to evaluate a lived experience peer support intervention for accessing mental health care in primary care (PS-PC). Four medical practices across Australia will be randomly allocated to switch from control to intervention, until all practices are delivering the PS-PC intervention. The study will enrol 66 patients at each practice (total sample size of 264). Over a period of 3-4 months, 12 h of practical and emotional support provided by lived experience peer workers will be available to participants. Scale-based questionnaires will inform intervention efficacy in terms of mental health outcomes (e.g., self-efficacy) and other health outcomes (e.g., healthcare-related costs) over four time points. Other perspectives will be explored through scales completed by approximately 150 family members or carers (carer burden) and 16 peer workers (self-efficacy) pre- and post-intervention, and 20 medical practice staff members (attitudes toward peer workers) at the end of each study site's involvement in the intervention. Interviews (n = 60) and six focus groups held toward the end of each study site's involvement will further explore the views of participants, family members or carers, peer workers, and practice staff to better understand the efficacy and acceptability of the intervention.Discussion This mixed-methods, multi-centre, stepped-wedge controlled study will be the first to evaluate the implementation of peer workers in the primary care mental health care sector.Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12623001189617. Registered on 17 November 2023, https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=386715
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [11] Commonwealth of Australia, 2020, National Study of Mental Health and Wellbeing
  • [12] Commonwealth of Australia, 2022, Monitoring mental health and suicide prevention reform: National Report 2021
  • [13] Implementation evaluation of the Telephone Lifestyle Coaching (TLC) program: organizational factors associated with successful implementation
    Damschroder, Laura J.
    Reardon, Caitlin M.
    Sperber, Nina
    Robinson, Claire H.
    Fickel, Jacqueline J.
    Oddone, Eugene Z.
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2017, 7 (02) : 233 - 241
  • [14] Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science
    Damschroder, Laura J.
    Aron, David C.
    Keith, Rosalind E.
    Kirsh, Susan R.
    Alexander, Jeffery A.
    Lowery, Julie C.
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2009, 4
  • [15] Dawda P., 2017, Experience based Co-design: a toolkit for Australia
  • [16] Forman J., 2008, EMPIRICAL RES BIOETH
  • [17] Gillard S, 2022, LANCET PSYCHIAT, V9, P125, DOI 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00398-9
  • [18] Subjective caregiver burden: validity of the 10-item short version of the Burden Scale for Family Caregivers BSFC-s
    Graessel, Elmar
    Berth, Hendrik
    Lichte, Thomas
    Grau, Hannes
    [J]. BMC GERIATRICS, 2014, 14
  • [19] GraSSel E., 2003, DEV VALIDATION BURDE
  • [20] Recovery Assessment Scale - Domains and Stages (RAS-DS): Its feasibility and outcome measurement capacity
    Hancock, Nicola
    Scanlan, Justin Newton
    Honey, Anne
    Bundy, Anita C.
    O'Shea, Katrina
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 49 (07) : 624 - 633