On the use of Parylene C polymer as substrate for peripheral nerve electrodes

被引:0
作者
Natàlia de la Oliva
Matthias Mueller
Thomas Stieglitz
Xavier Navarro
Jaume del Valle
机构
[1] Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona,Institute of Neurosciences, Department of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology
[2] and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED),Laboratory for Biomedical Microtechnology, Department of Microsystems Engineering
[3] Albert-Ludwig-University Freiburg,IMTEK
[4] CSIC and BIST,Catalan Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (ICN2)
[5] Campus UAB,undefined
来源
Scientific Reports | / 8卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Parylene C is a highly flexible polymer used in several biomedical implants. Since previous studies have reported valuable biocompatible and manufacturing characteristics for brain and intraneural implants, we tested its suitability as a substrate for peripheral nerve electrodes. We evaluated 1-year-aged in vitro samples, where no chemical differences were observed and only a slight deviation on Young’s modulus was found. The foreign body reaction (FBR) to longitudinal Parylene C devices implanted in the rat sciatic nerve for 8 months was characterized. After 2 weeks, a capsule was formed around the device, which continued increasing up to 16 and 32 weeks. Histological analyses revealed two cell types implicated in the FBR: macrophages, in contact with the device, and fibroblasts, localized in the outermost zone after 8 weeks. Molecular analysis of implanted nerves comparing Parylene C and polyimide devices revealed a peak of inflammatory cytokines after 1 day of implant, returning to low levels thereafter. Only an increase of CCL2 and CCL3 was found at chronic time-points for both materials. Although no molecular differences in the FBR to both polymers were found, the thick tissue capsule formed around Parylene C puts some concern on its use as a scaffold for intraneural electrodes.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 128 条
[1]  
Navarro X(2005)A critical review of interfaces with the peripheral nervous system for the control of neuroprostheses and hybrid bionic systems J. Peripher. Nerv. Syst. 10 229-58
[2]  
del Valle J(2013)Interfaces with the peripheral nerve for the control of neuroprostheses Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 109 63-83
[3]  
Navarro X(2011)Comparative analysis of transverse intrafascicular multichannel, longitudinal intrafascicular and multipolar cuff electrodes for the selective stimulation of nerve fascicles J. Neural Eng. 8 36023-27
[4]  
Badia J(2016)Intraneural stimulation elicits discrimination of textural features by artificial fingertip in intact and amputee humans Elife 5 1-100
[5]  
Oddo CM(2014)Restoring natural sensory feedback in real-time bidirectional hand prostheses Sci. Transl. Med. 6 222ra19-777
[6]  
Raspopovic S(2008)Foreign body reaction to biomaterials Seminars in Immunology 20 86-275
[7]  
Anderson JM(2008)A review of the foreign-body response to subcutaneously-implanted devices: the role of macrophages and cytokines in biofouling and fibrosis J. diabetes Sci. Technol. 2 768-2594
[8]  
Rodriguez A(2007)An Investigation of Long-Term Performance of Minimally Invasive Glucose Biosensors Diabetes Technol. Ther. 9 265-86
[9]  
Chang DT(2016)Methods for Implant Acceptance and Wound Healing: Material Selection and Implant Location Modulate Macrophage and Fibroblast Phenotypes Adv. Healthc. Mater. 5 2575-598
[10]  
Ward KW(2012)The effects of substrate stiffness on the J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 100 1375-2666