Dictatorial domains in preference aggregation

被引:0
|
作者
Ugur Ozdemir
M. Remzi Sanver
机构
[1] Pennsylvania State University,Department of Economics
[2] Istanbul Bilgi University,Department of Economics
来源
Social Choice and Welfare | 2007年 / 28卷
关键词
Social Choice; Social Welfare Function; Preference Aggregation; Social Choice Function; Full Domain;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We call a domain of preference orderings “dictatorial” if there exists no Arrovian (Pareto optimal, IIA and non-dictatorial) social welfare function defined over that domain. In a finite world of alternatives where indifferences are ruled out, we identify a condition which implies the dictatoriality of a domain. This condition, to which we refer as “being essentially saturated”, is fairly weak. In fact, independent of the number of alternatives, there exists an essentially saturated (hence dictatorial) domain which consists of precisely six orderings. Moreover, this domain exhibits the superdictatoriality property, i.e., every superdomain of it is also dictatorial. Thus, given m alternatives, the ratio of the size of a superdictatorial domain to the size of the full domain may be as small as 6/m!, converging to zero as m increases.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 76
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Parsimonious Mixed-Effects HodgeRank for Crowdsourced Preference Aggregation
    Xu, Qianqian
    Xiong, Jiechao
    Cao, Xiaochun
    Yao, Yuan
    MM'16: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 ACM MULTIMEDIA CONFERENCE, 2016, : 841 - 850
  • [42] First-Order Logic for Decision Problems with Preference Aggregation
    Araujo, Arnaldo
    Martins, Ana Teresa
    Romero, Davi
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2016 5TH BRAZILIAN CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (BRACIS 2016), 2016, : 498 - 503
  • [43] Processing Data from Interlaboratory Comparisons by the Method of Preference Aggregation
    Muravyov, S. V.
    Marinushkina, I. A.
    MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2016, 58 (12) : 1285 - 1291
  • [44] Consistent union and prioritized consistent union: new operations for preference aggregation
    Michaël Rademaker
    Bernard De Baets
    Annals of Operations Research, 2012, 195 : 237 - 259
  • [45] First-Order Logic Formalisation of Impossibility Theorems in Preference Aggregation
    Grandi, Umberto
    Endriss, Ulle
    JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL LOGIC, 2013, 42 (04) : 595 - 618
  • [46] First-Order Logic Formalisation of Impossibility Theorems in Preference Aggregation
    Umberto Grandi
    Ulle Endriss
    Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2013, 42 : 595 - 618
  • [47] Consistent union and prioritized consistent union: new operations for preference aggregation
    Rademaker, Michael
    De Baets, Bernard
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2012, 195 (01) : 237 - 259
  • [48] Correction to: 'Information and preference aggregation' (vol 24, pg 395, 2005)
    Campbell, DE
    Kelly, JS
    SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 2005, 24 (03) : 395 - 396
  • [49] Preference aggregation theory without acyclicity: The core without majority dissatisfaction
    Kumabe, Masahiro
    Mihara, H. Reiju
    GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2011, 72 (01) : 187 - 201
  • [50] Inertial MEMS Sensors Accuracy Improvement by Interval Fusion with Preference Aggregation
    Muravyov, Sergey
    Baranov, Pavel
    Khudonogova, Liudmila
    Minh Dai Ho
    2020 IEEE SENSORS, 2020,