Dictatorial domains in preference aggregation

被引:0
|
作者
Ugur Ozdemir
M. Remzi Sanver
机构
[1] Pennsylvania State University,Department of Economics
[2] Istanbul Bilgi University,Department of Economics
来源
Social Choice and Welfare | 2007年 / 28卷
关键词
Social Choice; Social Welfare Function; Preference Aggregation; Social Choice Function; Full Domain;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We call a domain of preference orderings “dictatorial” if there exists no Arrovian (Pareto optimal, IIA and non-dictatorial) social welfare function defined over that domain. In a finite world of alternatives where indifferences are ruled out, we identify a condition which implies the dictatoriality of a domain. This condition, to which we refer as “being essentially saturated”, is fairly weak. In fact, independent of the number of alternatives, there exists an essentially saturated (hence dictatorial) domain which consists of precisely six orderings. Moreover, this domain exhibits the superdictatoriality property, i.e., every superdomain of it is also dictatorial. Thus, given m alternatives, the ratio of the size of a superdictatorial domain to the size of the full domain may be as small as 6/m!, converging to zero as m increases.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 76
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Characterizations of scoring methodsfor preference aggregation
    Pavel Yu. Chebotarev
    Elena Shamis
    Annals of Operations Research, 1998, 80 (0) : 299 - 332
  • [22] Limiting dictatorial rules
    Torres, R
    JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 41 (07) : 913 - 935
  • [23] The limitations of the Arrovian consistency of domains with a fixed preference
    Nguyen, James
    THEORY AND DECISION, 2019, 87 (02) : 183 - 199
  • [24] The limitations of the Arrovian consistency of domains with a fixed preference
    James Nguyen
    Theory and Decision, 2019, 87 : 183 - 199
  • [25] Unanimity in attribute-based preference domains
    Gordon, Sidartha
    SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 2015, 44 (01) : 13 - 29
  • [26] Ordinal measurement, preference aggregation and interlaboratory comparisons
    Muravyov, Sergey V.
    MEASUREMENT, 2013, 46 (08) : 2927 - 2935
  • [27] Incompleteness and incomparability in preference aggregation: Complexity results
    Pini, M. S.
    Rossi, F.
    Venable, K. B.
    Walsh, T.
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2011, 175 (7-8) : 1272 - 1289
  • [28] Preference Aggregation in the Generalised Unavailable Candidate Model
    Sebert, Arnaud Grivet
    Maudet, Nicolas
    Perny, Patrice
    Viappiani, Paolo
    ALGORITHMIC DECISION THEORY, ADT 2021, 2021, 13023 : 35 - 50
  • [29] Solidarity in preference aggregation: Improving on a status quo
    Harless, Patrick
    GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2016, 95 : 73 - 87
  • [30] Group Preference Aggregation: A Nash Equilibrium Approach
    Zhao, Hongke
    Liu, Qi
    Ge, Yong
    Kong, Ruoyan
    Chen, Enhong
    2016 IEEE 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA MINING (ICDM), 2016, : 679 - 688