Determination of ochratoxin A in grains by immuno-ultrafiltration and HPLC-fluorescence detection after postcolumn derivatisation in an electrochemical cell

被引:0
作者
Elisabeth Viktoria Reiter
Margit Cichna-Markl
Duck-Hwa Chung
Won-Bo Shim
Jürgen Zentek
Ebrahim Razzazi-Fazeli
机构
[1] University of Veterinary Medicine,Institute of Animal Nutrition
[2] Freie Universität Berlin,Institute of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine
[3] University of Vienna,Department of Analytical Chemistry
[4] Gyeongsang National University,Department of Food Science and Technology
[5] University of Veterinary Medicine,VetCore/Proteomics
来源
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry | 2011年 / 400卷
关键词
Ochratoxin A; Immuno-ultrafiltration; HPLC; Electrochemical cell; Sample clean-up; Grains;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The paper presents a new sample clean-up method based on immuno-ultrafiltration for the analysis of ochratoxin A in cereals. In contrast to immunoaffinity chromatography, in immuno-ultrafiltration, the antibodies are used in non-immobilised form. Ochratoxin A was extracted with ACN/water (60/40, v/v), and the extract was loaded onto the ultrafiltration device. After a washing step with phosphate-buffered saline, containing 0.05% Tween 20, ochratoxin A was eluted with MeOH/acetic acid (99/1, v/v). The detection of ochratoxin A was carried out with high-performance liquid chromatography and a fluorescence detector coupled to an electrochemical cell (Coring cell). The electrochemical cell was used to eliminate matrix interferences by oxidising matrix compounds. The method was validated by repeatedly analysing spiked barley and rye samples as well as a certified wheat reference material. Recoveries and standard deviations (1 SD) were found to be 71 ± 9%, 77 ± 12% and 77 ± 8% in wheat, barley and rye, respectively. The limit of detection (S/N = 3) and limit of quantitation (S/N = 10) were determined to be 0.4 μg kg-1 and 1 μg kg-1. The analysis of the certified reference material resulted in ochratoxin A concentrations which were in the range assigned by the producer. Additionally, the effect of the electrochemical cell on other widely used clean-up techniques, namely the immunoaffinity clean-up and multifunctional columns (Mycosep #229), was evaluated. In all clean-up methods, an improvement of the chromatogram quality was registered.
引用
收藏
页码:2615 / 2622
页数:7
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Pohland AE(1982)Physicochemical data for some selected mycotoxins Pure Appl Chem 54 2219-2284
  • [2] Schuller PL(2004)Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Contaminants in Food Chain on a request from the Commission related to ochratoxin A (OTA) as undesirable substance in animal feed Request No EFSA-Q-2003-039 The EFSA Journal 101 1-36
  • [3] Steyn PS(2006)Commission Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 of 19 December 2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuff Official J European Union L 364 5-24
  • [4] Van Egmond HP(2005)Occurrence of ochratoxin A in commodities and processed food—a review of EU occurrence data Food Addit Contam 22 26-30
  • [5] Jørgensen K(1998)Use of various clean-up procedures for the analysis of ochratoxin A in cereals J Chromatogr A 815 67-73
  • [6] Solfrizzo M(2004)Rapid determination of ochratoxin A in cereals and cereal products by liquid chromatography J Chromatogr A 1046 127-131
  • [7] Avantaggiato G(2008)Determination of ochratoxin A in organic and non-organic cereals and cereal products from Spain and Portugal Food Chem 107 525-530
  • [8] Visconti A(2004)Analysis of wheat extracts for ochratoxin A by molecularly imprinted solid-phase extraction and pulsed elution Anal Bioanal Chem 378 1903-1906
  • [9] Blesa J(2006)The comparison of two clean-up procedures, multifunctional column and immunoaffinity column, for HPLC determination of ochratoxin A in cereals, raisins and green coffee beans Talanta 69 650-655
  • [10] Berrada H(2008)Comparison of two sample preparation techniques for the determination of ochratoxin A in grains J Liq Chromatogr Related Technol 31 912-925