Complementary approaches to evaluation of technology in science education

被引:0
|
作者
Kumar D.D. [1 ]
Altschuld J.W. [2 ]
机构
[1] College of Education, Florida Atlantic University, Davie, FL 33314
[2] College of Education, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Context; Evaluation; Science; Teacher education; Technology;
D O I
10.1023/A:1014621631205
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
An interesting and relevant case involving two distinct systematic evaluations, traditional as well as somewhat nontraditional, of a science teacher education project with a heavy technology emphasis is discussed. Comparisons of the two separate evaluations of the same project revealed the complexity of evaluating technology projects and the multifaceted ways in which the evaluation endeavor could be approached, and provided an unusual situation and seldom seen opportunity for thinking about such evaluations. Additionally, what some other authors have said about the evaluations of efforts that take advantage of technology in the training of science teachers will also be explored. Evaluators must become active players in guiding the infusion of technology in preservice science programs. If evaluators, don't function to identify what works and what doesn't and what induces the best supportive environment, then who will? © 2002 Plenum Publishing Corporation.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 191
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE COMMUNICATION OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY IN HIGHER EDUCATION
    Perez Jimenez, Leyane
    REVISTA CONRADO, 2016, 12 (52): : 78 - 85
  • [2] SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY CONTEST IN SECONDARY EDUCATION
    Rodriguez Sanchez, Ricardo
    ESPIRAL-CUADERNOS DEL PROFESORADO, 2009, 2 (03): : 49 - 54
  • [3] Learning science and technology through cooperative education
    Coll, Richard K.
    Eames, Chris
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF COOPERATIVE EDUCATION, 2007, 8 (02): : 131 - 147
  • [4] APPROACHES TO DEVELOP HUMAN CAPITAL IN RUSSIAN SCIENCE AND HIGHER EDUCATION
    Balykhin, M.
    Stroev, V.
    Babin, Y.
    Yudina, T.
    EDULEARN18: 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2018, : 8070 - 8077
  • [5] INTERFEROMETRIC SAR PROCESSING AS A SUBJECT FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION
    Ito, Yosuke
    Nii, Hiroshi
    Takeichi, Tomohiko
    2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2014,
  • [6] EVALUATING CLASSROOM PRACTICE: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF APPROACHES TO EVALUATION IN LARGE SCALE TEACHER EDUCATION OR EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMMES, IN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT CONTEXTS
    Power, Tom
    McCormick, Robert
    ICERI2014: 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION, 2014, : 1269 - 1275
  • [7] Science and Technology Education in Slovenian Compulsory Basic School: Possibilities for Gifted Education
    Torkar, Gregor
    Avsec, Stanislav
    Cepic, Mojca
    Savec, Vesna Ferk
    Jurisevic, Mojca
    ROEPER REVIEW-A JOURNAL ON GIFTED EDUCATION, 2018, 40 (02): : 139 - 150
  • [8] EVALUATION OF THE IMPACT OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ON THE LABOUR MARKET
    Jazdauskaite, Jorune
    Privarova, Magdalena
    Baranskaite, Edita
    Juscius, Vytautas
    Kelemen-Henyel, Nikoletta
    MARKETING AND MANAGEMENT OF INNOVATIONS, 2021, (04): : 153 - 167
  • [9] A study of verbal section teacher candidates' attitute towards science, science education and technology
    Kizilcik, Hasan Sahin
    Temiz, Burak Kagan
    Tan, Mustafa
    Ingec, Sebnem Kandil
    EGITIM VE BILIM-EDUCATION AND SCIENCE, 2007, 32 (146): : 80 - 88
  • [10] Promoting science and technology in primary education: a review of integrated curricula
    Gresnigt, Rens
    Taconis, Ruurd
    van Keulen, Hanno
    Gravemeijer, Koeno
    Baartman, Liesbeth
    STUDIES IN SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2014, 50 (01) : 47 - 84