The Personality Disorders Institute/Borderline Personality Disorder Research Foundation Randomized Control Trial for Borderline Personality Disorder: Reliability of Axis I and II Diagnoses

被引:0
作者
Kenneth L. Critchfield
Kenneth N. Levy
John F. Clarkin
机构
[1] Joan and Sanford I Weill Medical College of Cornell University,New York
[2] University of Utah,Presbyterian Hospital
来源
Psychiatric Quarterly | 2007年 / 78卷
关键词
Borderline personality disorder; Randomized control trial; Reliability;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Personality Disorder Institute/Borderline Personality Disorder Research Foundation randomized control trial (PDI/BPDRF RCT) is a randomized control trial comparing three treatments for borderline personality disorder (BPD). An important issue for any RCT is diagnostic reliability, demonstration of which is necessary to evaluate claims of a treatment’s efficacy for a given population. The present paper examines the interrater reliability of Axis I and II disorders in the context of a high base rate of BPD features for participants referred for inclusion in the RCT. Our results indicate good to excellent levels of interrater reliability for all Axis I and II disorders in this context. Assessors were able to reliably diagnose BPD, exclusionary criteria, and comorbid diagnoses. This data is important for comparing findings and sample composition across different studies using similar sampling strategies, especially as treatments are increasingly being developed and tested for BPD.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 24
页数:9
相关论文
共 78 条
[11]  
Williams JBW(2003)A psychodynamic treatment for severe personality disorders: Issues in treatment development Psychoanalytic Inquiry 23 248-267
[12]  
Gibbon M(2004)The Personality Disorders Institute/Borderline Personality Disorder Research Foundation randomized control trial for borderline personality disorder: Rationale, methods, and patient characteristics Journal of Personality Disorders 18 51-71
[13]  
First MB(1997)Interrater reliability and internal consistency of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM IV Axis II Personality Disorders (SCID II), version 2.0 Journal of Personality Disorders 11 279-284
[14]  
Linehan MM(2000)The collaborative longitudinal personality disorders study: II. Reliability of Axis I and II diagnoses Journal of Personality Disorders 14 291-299
[15]  
Scheel KR(1995)The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM III R Personality Disorders (SCID II) Part II: Multisite test retest reliability study Journal of Personality Disorders 9 92-104
[16]  
Widiger TA(1979)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability Psychological Bulletin 86 420-428
[17]  
Grove WM(1991)High interrater reliability for the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM III R Axis I (SCID I) Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 84 167-173
[18]  
Andreasen NC(1998)Training and quality assurance with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM IV (SCID I/P) Psychiatry Research 79 163-173
[19]  
McDonald-Scott P(2002)Evaluation of DSM-IV personality disorder criteria as assessed by the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV personality disorders Comprehensive Psychiatry 43 285-300
[20]  
Zimmerman M(1987)The Personality Disorder Examination: A preliminary report Journal of Personality Disorders 1 1-13