The productivity effects of stock option schemes: evidence from Finnish panel data

被引:0
作者
Derek C. Jones
Panu Kalmi
Mikko Mäkinen
机构
[1] Hamilton College,Department of Economics
[2] Helsinki School of Economics and HECER,Department of Economics
来源
Journal of Productivity Analysis | 2010年 / 33卷
关键词
Productivity; Panel data; Employee stock options; Compensation and compensation methods and their effects; D24; C33; J33; M52;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this study we investigate the productivity effects of employee stock option schemes. We estimate Cobb-Douglas production functions by using new panel data for all Finnish publicly listed firms during 1992–2002. The data enable us to distinguish broad-based option plans, for which all employees are eligible, from those selectively allocated to particular employees. For both type of schemes, our baseline fixed effects estimators consistently find statistically insignificant associations with firm productivity. When endogeneity of production inputs and option-schemes are taken into account we continue to find no evidence of a link with firm productivity. Our main findings are consistent with hypotheses that predict negligible effects of option plans for enterprise performance, such as those based on free riding, psychological expectancy theory, accounting myopia, or rent-seeking. We consider reasons why our empirical findings on the impact of broad-based options differ from those found in earlier studies.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 80
页数:13
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
Alchian A(1972)Production, information costs, and economic organisation Am Econ Rev 62 777-795
[2]  
Demsetz H(1991)Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations Rev Econ Stud 58 277-297
[3]  
Arellano M(1995)Another look at the instrumental variables estimation of error-components model J Econ 68 29-51
[4]  
Bond S(2005)Offering stock options to gauge managerial talent J Acc Econ 40 189-210
[5]  
Arellano M(1999)Unequally spaced panel data regressions with AR(1) disturbances Economet Theor 15 814-823
[6]  
Bover O(2003)Executive compensation as an agency problem J Econ Perspect 17 71-92
[7]  
Arya A(2007)Employee sentiment and stock option compensation J Finance Econ 84 667-712
[8]  
Mittendorf B(1982)Serial correlation and the fixed effects model Rev Econ Stud 49 533-549
[9]  
Baltagi BH(1998)Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models J Econ 87 115-143
[10]  
Wu PX(2000)GMM estimation with persistent panel data: an application to production functions Econ Rev 19 321-340